Just when the bottom of the barrel of cheap political cynicism seemed thoroughly scoured by the opposition parties, they found a new low. Take the current controversy over the length of the workweek. To curry favor with workers, the opposition amended the Executive Yuan's original 44-hour workweek plan and made it 42 hours. But KMT chairman Lien Chan
So now the Executive Yuan is to return to its initial policy. It is doing so to please the KMT; yet it is the KMT which is responsible for what it now desires not being implemented in the first place. While Council of Labor Affairs chairperson Chen Chu
Taiwan's industrial base is changing as traditional industries die out and the high-tech sector becomes its core. Because the traditional industries have to rely on labor to expand production value, shrinking work hours will cost them their competitive edge. The high-tech industries, however, do not need to rely on labor because they can increase productivity through technological and management readjustments.
The problem is that almost all of Taiwan's industrial leaders come from the traditional sectors. And these same industrialists have also long been a driving force in the KMT. Their lobbying has turned the idea that "labor equals productivity" into a government mantra. As a result, the possibility that shorter work hours could stimulate industrial productivity, phase out uncompetitive industries, speed up the development of entertainment and recreation industries and boost consumption has been ignored.
Workers will, of course, vilify the government for retracting the shorter workweek, blame the opposition though it might. More importantly, for the Executive Yuan to propose an amendment without coordinating with the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the Council of Labor Affairs is hardly a role model for decision-making.
Meanwhile, the opposition parties are demanding that Chen admit that his campaign promise to implement a 40-hour workweek by 2002 was a mistake and apologize for it. Rubbish! Chen wasn't the only one floating such an election balloon -- both Lien and James Soong
Criticism of Chen's lack of a complete policy package, however, is worth noting. If Chen does not want to forgo his 40-hours-by-2002 promise, he should reiterate it and work to prepare Taiwan's society for the coming change. If he thinks the promise cannot be realized, then he should tell the industry leaders just that.
Shorter work hours are a global trend and do not have a direct correlation with productivity. The US is the world's most productive economy and has had a 40-hour week for 60 years. Politics has muddied the issue. But the government needs to come up with a whole new package of short, medium and long-term policies for both labor and industry. It can no longer shirk this responsibility.
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,
RSS