The "consensus that there is no consensus" (
Anti-nuclear groups held a march on Nov. 12, in which tens of thousands of people demonstrated in support of the scrapping of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant construction. Their appeals to the public relied on the ideas of "a safe living environment in Taiwan" and "our responsibility toward our future generations." The opposition parties remained silent, while the ruling party took on a new position by calling for rationality. I believe that the march should be seen as a means of educating the public, not merely as a means of expressing an anti-nuclear point of view. It is time we thought about what is the fastest and safest way to turn Taiwan into a "nuclear-free homeland" (非核家園). This is the only way by which the social movement can push for any substantive consensus.
A "nuclear-free homeland" has become a mainstream ideal among Taiwan residents. The major goals of the anti-nuclear movement are to awaken the environmental awareness of an even greater number of people, as well as to condemn the damage done to our soil through blind economic development. Surveys indicate, however, that many Taiwanese people continue to support the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant. The dispute over the project has ignited the current political crisis. Our discussion of the matter must therefore be done rationally, rather than in a manner which silences the pro-nuclear camp by labeling them "unpatriotic." Otherwise, any consensus reached would be empty and illusory.
To be fair, many supporters of the plant are not entirely supportive of nuclear energy, just as opponents of nuclear power are not necessarily anti-business. In fact, supporters of the plant believe that plans for alternative energy sources should be implemented as soon as possible before gradually abolishing nuclear energy entirely in order to make the dream of a "nuclear-free homeland" a reality. In other words, they disagree that scrapping the plant is the only way to achieve the goal of a "nuclear-free homeland." They feel that scrapping the plant would destabilize the economy, increase the difficulties of finding alternative energy sources, lengthen the life of the existing three nuclear power plants without decreasing the amount of nuclear waste produced, and increase safety issues. The crux of the matter therefore is really that the supporters feel that alternative energy sources are workable only under stable economic conditions, for which construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is a precondition.
It is useless to try to convince the pro-nuclear camp by repeatedly stressing the danger of nuclear plants and nuclear waste. The best strategy is to provide reliable and convincing evidence to prove that, without the additional nuclear plant, economic development will not be jeopardized and all the alternative plans will be feasible.
The Executive Yuan has ignored the fact that what many supporters of nuclear power actually want is a steady energy supply. As a result, many people continue to support the plant's construction despite a trend in favor of "a nuclear-free homeland." The issue is not who is right or wrong, but how to educate each other, against a backdrop of different standpoints. If we do not attempt to understand each other and continue to question each other's motives, polarization will be aggravated, creating even more obstacles to communication.
Although Taiwan's political parties claim that their positions on nuclear power are backed by the public, they actually fail to see that the public backs neither extreme. The people simply differ on their sense of logic. Since our political parties have neither effectively communicated with each other nor educated their supporters, anti-nuclear demonstrations should make up for these inadequacies by educating the public and encouraging the political parties to jointly establish a "nuclear-free energy policy." Irrespective of what the ruling of the Council of Grand Justices turns out to be, the march will have a place in history if it can push for a consensus on a "nuclear-free energy policy" among different political parties.
James Hsueh is a professor of the Department of Sociology at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry