US President Bill Clinton arrived for a three-day visit to Vietnam late Thursday night. His trip is full of profound symbolic significance. He is the first sitting US president to visit Vietnam since the Vietnam War. Clinton's personal anti-war record further enhances the significance of his visit. The trip is also bringing much in the way of substantive economic benefits for both sides, as shown by a US$500 million agreement between Vietnam's state-run airline and Boeing Corp -- the biggest transaction of 10 set to be signed by US companies during the trip. Trade relations between the two countries are obviously heading for significant changes, creating more employment opportunities for both sides.
On April 30, 1975, North Vietnam captured Saigon, ending the so-called "American War" and completing the unification of South and North Vietnam. A 20-year-long (1975 to 1994) US economic embargo ensued, leading to the political and economic isolation of Vietnam, an outpouring of refugees, and difficulties in post-war reconstruction.
Clinton's presidency has overseen major shifts in US-Vietnamese relations. First, the economic embargo was lifted on Feb. 2, 1994 and then formal diplomatic relations were established on July 11, 1995. On July 13 of this year, the two sides signed a bilateral economic trade agreement, normalizing their economic relationship. A property dispute between the two has been resolved by the establishment of offices in other's country. The only issues left are the remains of prisoners of war and US soldiers missing in action, as well the cleaning-up of landmines.
Vietnam's continued skepticism toward the US, however, has much to do with the way it has been treated in the post-war era. From Jimmy Carter to Ronald Reagan to the George Bush administration, Washington continued to view Vietnam with a cold war mentality, seeing it solely as a satellite of the Soviet Union. Therefore, the US continued to isolate Vietnam economically and diplomatically. In addition, some veteran organizations and former South Vietnam officials and officers living in the US continued to live in the past, unable to acknowledge that reform and liberalization have changed Vietnam.
Although Vietnam continues to be a one-party totalitarian country and a rather closed society, it is much more politically stable in comparison with Indonesia and the Philippines. While Vietnam's average annual income per capita of US$350 lags behind most other developing countries, at least the living standard in the cities has largely improved due to economic liberalization.
Even more importantly, 60 percent of Vietnam's 79 million people belong to the post-war generation. They feel no antagonism toward the US. The biggest obstacles toward normalization of relations are political and cultural differences. Even hardliners believe that while the lessons of the war should never be forgotten, it does no good to touch upon old injuries now. They want stability, prosperity and international recognition as well.
To the Vietnamese government, Clinton's visit symbolizes Washington's acceptance of the country's unification and independence, as well as recognition of Vietnam's international status. It is the end-point to decades of anti-colonial struggle.
To Clinton, the trip may be the last diplomatic hurrah of his presidency. In view of the possible resentment by conservatives and Vietnam veterans, he is unable to apologize for the death of millions of Vietnamese during the war, but he can at least acknowledge the suffering of the Vietnamese. That should be sufficient to close the chapter on the war.
The US' participation in the war prevented the spread of communism to other Southeast Asian countries. Now it is time for other Asian countries to help Vietnam back onto its feet.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations