Along with the transformation of the structure of industry in the past few years, traditional, labor-intensive industries have, one after another, left Taiwan for Southeast Asia and China. Moving offshore has recently become a trend among the high-tech information sector as well. As a result, the problem of unemployment among low-skilled and unskilled laborers is becoming increasingly serious.
The Council of Labor Affairs (CLA) has put forward a proposal to reduce working hours and lower the percentage of foreign labor employed in Taiwan. This, plus measures to reduce energy and water supplies, has effectively kicked industry where it hurts. Several large enterprises -- both TAIEX and TAISDAQ companies -- have considered leaving. In addition, the domestic effects of a sluggish economy and lackluster stock market have caused a local unemployment problem to surface.
The CLA and labor representatives have long believed that foreign labor competes for local labor's rice bowl and that reducing the number of foreign laborers will improve the unemployment situation.
They're not aware, however, of another phenomenon -- one in which foreign labor guarantees job opportunities for local labor. This is because, as a society develops, local labor is ever more eager to avoid many types of jobs that involve heavy, dirty or highly polluting work. It is only the willingness of foreign workers to work hard for little pay, that allows traditional, labor-intensive industries to survive. In fact, if foreign labor numbers were reduced, factories would be unable to operate efficiently -- and local workers would lose jobs.
Another consideration is that weekly working hours have been reduced from 44 to 42 hours. In effect this gives laborers only a 5 percent increase in salary and benefits, but companies must pay additional over-time to workers opting to work over 42 hours a week to maintain productivity at established levels. Companies also incur costs in the co-ordination and transfer of staff for overtime work. Corporate expenditure has therefore increased by 15 to18 percent, eliminating companies profit margins, or even forcing them to operate at a loss. Naturally, labor-intensive industries who have been clinging to their Taiwan roots are unable and unwilling to force themselves to do so any longer. Southeast Asia and China are extending large welcome mats, offering labor conditions that are far better than those that prevail here.
Environmental protection departments have also given industry a lot of pressure. If domestic labor and capital interests cannot arrive at a consensus, businesses will inevitably choose to move out. If moving out creates the hope of getting a second breath and, moreover, if workers receive better treatment on foreign soil, who will want to stick around here, only to get bullied and yelled at? Actually, the true test will come after both Taiwan and China join the WTO next year. When that time comes and Taiwanese products made in China start flowing back into Taiwan, local industries will be completely unable to stem the low-capital, competitive advantages enjoyed by those that have moved off-shore. Be they agricultural products or general consumer goods, cheap Chinese-produced goods will take advantage of our low customs tariffs and come a-knocking.
When considering their future, how can those industries remaining in Taiwan -- for their own survival's sake -- not move ahead with plan to leave soon?
Talk of the future "big three links"
In sum, as no current development or trend is beneficial to labor, I would propose the following countermeasures:
First, the government needs to engage in more meticulous planning and discussion regarding foreign labor and related measures. Care must be taken so that the big isn't sacrificed for the sake of the small, leaving workers worse off. The government should also discuss in greater depth how it will achieve its policy objectives.
Second, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and the CLA should cooperate on industrial policy adjustments. Only concerted action will ensure the survival and shared prosperity of both labor and employers.
Third, the CLA 's Employment and Vocational Training Administration should increase promotion of job-transferral and multi-skill training programs for workers in industries that have moved off-shore. Any Taiwanese companies operating off-shore should have package measures and planning in place regarding compensation, as well as re-training for discharged workers, no matter what the industry.
Fourth, government departments need to listen more carefully and respectfully to the voice of business. There also have to be clear-cut measures that encourage businesses to foster a sense of social duty towards safeguarding the rights and interests of labor.
Fifth, the government should plan for the knowledge economy and financial measures appropriate to it, paying more attention to bringing in new jobs and new types of services. Measures for education and training need to be passed, to give workers the abilities and skills necessary to adjust to the age of the knowledge-based economy. Finally, it is to be hoped that when making China policy, officials will take into account the protection and advancement of job opportunities for domestic labor.
Chen Ming-chang is a professor in the department of business administration at National Taipei University.
Translated by Scudder Smith
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under