The drive to recall President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), caused by halting construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant (核四), has started a battle between the ruling and opposition parties. Whoever admits defeat first will lose both "face" and jeopardize his or her party's future. If both refuse to brake to save face, both will lose. If, however, both are willing to make concessions,despite embarrassment, they could effectively escape paying the costly price of a battle.
If the ruling and opposition parties were rational, one of them would have withdrawn from the battle by now. Neither, however, has shown any sign so far of retreating, because both predict that the other will chicken out first. Thus the fight has now become a test of determination and foresight.
Both sides realize that the chance of Chen being removed from office is high if the Legislative Yuan passes the recall motion. Although surveys recently conducted by the Executive Yuan show that about 63 percent of Taiwanese people disagree with the recall move, survey statistics and the number of voters who will actually vote to recall Chen are two different things. Should the voters of Taiwan decide to recall Chen, not only will the nations'ethnic conflicts be inflamed, but all future presidents will live under the recall threat. These consequences will harm the peace and stability of our nation. As a result, I disagree with such a strong over-reaction to the current chaos.
Even if the legislature fails to pass the recall motion, Chen should nevertheless engage in some self-reflection and come to terms with one fact: he is a lame-duck president. The Constitution vests limited authority in the president. The president therefore needs to resort to his personal charm and prestige to shape and forge a consensus of the people and the opposition parties for the promotion of national policies. The recent dispute has injured Chen's reputation, aggravating the difficulties he faces in governing. Besides, Chen's party is only a minority party in the legislature, making it even more difficult for him to promote his national policies.
Chen had a great opportunity to promote his policies in the three-month honeymoon period after his inauguration, since he enjoyed high levels of popular support at the time. He will never get another opportunity like that. Chen needs to realize that he and his administration are being challenged by powerful parties that make up a legislative majority. These parties have formed a united front precisely because of him.
It is to be hoped that Chen can learn to keep an open mind from now on, and listen to people's voices with a humble and honest attitude, so that he can win back people's hearts as well as stabilize his relations with the opposition. If he continues to rely on trickery and gimmicks to suppress the recall move, then his problems are only beginning.
Chen has recently shown goodwill by making an apology to the people of Taiwan and to KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰). This gesture, however, was insufficient to solve the dispute since all trust between the ruling and the opposition parties has been destroyed. Besides, if the opposition withdraws the recall motion now, they might be accused of having pushed the motion because of personal feelings or their parties' interests. Thus, if the KMT abandons the recall move, it will lose popular support and stature as the leader of the opposition alliance. To resolve the dispute, Chen perhaps needs to make a policy concession or a concession over government personnel, as well as respect the opposition parties' roles in the decision-making process.
Emile C. J. Sheng is an assistant professor of the department of political science at Soochow University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry