US citizens have taught their politicians a lesson at the turn of the millennium: "Respect public opinion." This lesson is also significant for a fledgling demo-cracy like Taiwan.
This US presidential election hangs in the balance, with unprecedentedly close results between Republican George W. Bush and Democrat Al Gore. Ballots are being recounted again and again in Florida, where a few hundred votes will decide who will garner the 25 electors' votes and become the first US president of the 21st century. The two men are less than 1 percent apart in their share of the popular vote. The gaps between the Democrats and Republicans also remains extremely close in Congress, with the Republicans winning only slight majorities in both the Senate and House elections.
With the two parties running neck and neck, it is difficult to see which way mainstream public opinion is heading. No wonder the results have caused many political observers to express concern about future political operations. Some even think the US faces severe social and political divisions.
Bush will be the next US president if he wins Florida, even though he may have won less of the popular vote than Gore. Despite the Republican majorities in Congress, an opponent with a higher popular mandate will be a thorn in Bush's side. If Gore wins, then popular votes may be consistent with the electoral college votes. But that hardly means that Gore will have an easy time, given that the Republicans control both houses.
That neither side has majority popular support and that Congress is split almost half and half, are indications that the US electorate is not satisfied with the political parties, politicians and their policies. They are not willing to give any party or individual enough support to go it alone. Whoever wins the elections must be careful about what he says and does and constantly be on the lookout for possible counter-attacks.
Leaders of congressional and public opinion have interpreted this new political climate as a sign that no single party will have absolute dominance of the White House or Congress. The key principle for political maneuvers will be bi-partisan consensus. Platforms that the two parties can agree on will be implemented first, while political disputes will have to be resolved through bi-partisan negotiations at Congress. Bi-partisan co-governance will be the key future trend.
Taiwan's political milieu is much more treacherous. If heavy-handed maneuvers are not permissible in US politics, they are even less so in Taiwan. After being elected president with a minority mandate, Chen Shui-bian
If Chen can learn from the US emphasis on subtle skills during political disputes -- respecting the other parties and public opinion, readjusting political priorities accordingly, implementing policies about which there is a popular consensus, and deferring more controversial policies, "conquering the hard with the soft" -- then Taiwan politics may shift to a completely different track in the next three years.
Chen proclaimed a "New Middle Way" soon after he took office, vowing to tread a path acceptable to a majority of society. For this, he was criticized by hardline supporters within his own party. Now Chen has shifted to his line and is coming under fire from opposition parties and Beijing. Conflict and harmony depends on what Chen has seen in the mirror of US politics, and how he decides to act on it.
Vincent Lin is associate editor in chief of the Taipei Times.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry