Is the political crisis over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant
When the KMT, split and humiliated after the May election, tried to reassert itself through its majority in the legislature, the DPP president became increasingly frustrated by his failure to push through his policies. With no money in the government coffers to implement his social welfare policies and the war against"black gold" going slowly, Chen Shui-bian
It is too bad that Chen made this policy issue his Rubicon, because his decision is fundamentally flawed. The Fourth Nuclear Power Plant is more than just a debate over nuclear energy. Some may argue that the KMT should not have started building this plant in the first place. Sure, if the power plant were still in its planning stage, the project would be relatively easy to cancel. But the KMT made the plant a cornerstone of its economic development policy. With the plant, the government was able to convince the public that Taiwan's power needs would be met well into the future. And of course, once the plant was started, there was no need to debate the alternatives.
When the DPP took power in May,?everyone knew that they wanted to stop construction of the plant. But by halting construction at this point, the DPP is basically attempting to change past policy, rather than influencing present and future policy. This is a bad precedent for Taiwan. By trying to go back and overturn past decisions without a powerful mandate to do so, Chen is promoting a culture of undoing that is detrimental to Taiwan's democracy.?If he succeeds, what is to stop future KMT or PFP governments from overturning his policies when he leaves office? If this happens, all continuity in government will be lost.
Chen's lack of economic experience is his greatest liability. When he was a legislator and mayor of Taipei, he mainly concentrated on social and political issues. Decisions on these issues do not always have a direct effect on the economy. For example, tearing down private houses on public land or renaming a park may score political points, but they do not have a major effect on the economy. Stopping construction of the plant unquestionably does. By halting construction, Chen was effectively saying the KMT's energy policy was fundamentally wrong, so we have a responsibility to change it. "Don't worry though, we, the DPP, a party with no experience in making national economic policy, guarantee that there will be no power shortages in the future." How is the business community supposed to place this amount of trust in a government with no track record?
The president needs to learn how to manage change while maintaining continuity. On the national economic level, even changes that may ultimately be beneficial have serious short-term consequences. If the party in power cannot take into account both the short-term impact and long-term benefits when making economic policy, the economy is headed for a rough ride over the next four years.
William W. Hoyle
Taichung
The socialisation of costs and the privatisation of benefits is a basic practice of capital accumulation. Even if Christopher Lingle's highly questionable rendition of nuclear power plant accidents were accurate ("Nuclear facts and fiction, Nov. 12, page 9), he leaves out completely the crucial issue of nuclear waste disposal. This includes waste from nuclear plants and nuclear fuel production as well as decommissioned nuclear plants.
Lanyu's Tao (Yami) Aboriginal people currently carry the bulk of the externalised costs of Taiwan's nuclear power production in what some have termed a serious case of "environmental racism." Several thousand of the 100,000 barrels of nuclear waste there are leaking, contaminating Lanyu. The Tao are politically marginalized and therefore are forced to carry the costs of Taiwan's industrialization while receiving little of the benefit.
The mining and refining of uranium creates significant environmental dangers. For example, in July 1979, a spill from a uranium mill tailings dam in the US, near Churchrock, New Mexico, released 94 million gallons of tailings liquids and 1,100 tons of tailings solids into the Rio Puerco River. This contaminated the only water source for the local Navaho Aboriginal peoples. Throughout the world, production of nuclear fuels is extremely polluting, producing massive amounts of radioactive tailings wastes. There are no proven methods for safe long-term disposal of nuclear wastes. Some isotopes remain toxic for several thousand years so nuclear power requires future generations to bare the costs of containment.
Lingle advocates continuation of severe discrimination against those who are politically weak such as the Tao, Navaho, the young and even future generations by forcing them to carry the social costs of today's capital accumulation. He repeatedly advocates the "divine right" of markets over all other social considerations. This kind of economistic fundamentalism is extremely dangerous to present and future generations.
Mark Munsterhjelm
Sanchung City
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations