In November 1991, US Secretary of State James Baker, explaining the American position in the Persian Gulf crisis, said famously: "The economic lifeline of the industrial world runs from the Gulf, and we cannot permit a dictator such as this to sit astride that economic lifeline. And to bring it down to the level of the average American citizen, let me say that means jobs." Baker later admitted that his phraseology was not as felicitous as it might have been (later suggesting he should have said "economic prosperity"), but he always believed his central point was correct.
Indeed it was. It is still a point worth remembering, as world markets react to the collapse of the Palestinian-Israeli peace process and the sabotage bombing of the USS Cole. Oil prices spiked to 10-year highs, and Wall Street had a "gray Thursday," as the Dow Jones and NASDAQ averages fell precipitously. Later, both averages substantially recovered, and oil prices eased slightly, so the economic crisis atmosphere did not worsen appreciably. Diplomatic efforts to reduce tensions in Gaza and the West Bank continued, including the "summit" in Sharm el-Sheikh, although very little in concrete terms emerged from it.
Although violence in the occupied territories has recently dominated the media coverage, the gravest development was actually the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen. Whoever was ultimately responsible for instigating the attack (and that may well be different from whomever actually carried it out), no one can mistake that the real target was the US itself. The Cole was in transit to the Persian Gulf to take up its station in the continuing American efforts to enforce the weakening UN economic sanctions against Iraq. The attack seems analogous to the suicide bombing of the US Marine barracks in Lebanon in 1983, designed to intimidate the US into scaling back its presence or entirely disengaging from the region.
In the American presidential campaign, higher energy prices have already figured prominently, even before the recent surge in oil, and the Arab-Israeli conflict has always stirred political passions. The sickly euro has been further weakened by the fear of rising, dollar-denominated oil prices, and their potential adverse effects on an already-stalling European economy.
Moreover, many have worried for some time that Washington's nemesis, Saddam Hussein, was planning an "October surprise" during the closing weeks of the US campaign, intended in some way to disrupt or affect the elections. Reasoning that President Bill Clinton would be distracted or constrained, Saddam could believe that the US was especially vulnerable. Of course, whether or not the attack on the Cole was ordered by Iraq is presently unknown, but it would be entirely consistent with Iraq's two central foreign-policy objectives: breaking out of the remaining economic sanctions, and burying once and for all the efforts to keep Iraq from regaining weapons of mass destruction.
During the 1990 to 1991 Persian Gulf crisis, Saddam tried in countless ways to undermine the international coalition arrayed against him, and particularly to peel off the Arab allies standing with the US-led coalition in defense of Kuwait. There were repeated efforts to stir "the Arab street" to violence against the West and its regional allies, and especially to use the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian dispute to inflame that street against Israel's Western friends. Iraq and its surrogates continually tried to energize the UN Security Council to condemn Israeli practices in the occupied territories, and especially in Jerusalem, and thus distract the Council from its focus on evicting Iraq from Kuwait. World oil prices remained high and uncertain until Desert Storm succeeded.
RSS