Since the Executive Yuan announced its decision to discontinue construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant
Why would the KMT want to lend its support to a recall motion? The KMT is currently the majority party in the Legislative Yuan, so why doesn't it opt for a vote of no confidence in the Cabinet, rather than a recall? Because there is a hidden agenda.
First, a recall won't necessitate snap legislative elections -- a fact that is very important to the KMT. Although the KMT currently occupies more than half of the seats in the legislature, after next year's elections it is expected to lose its majority. The PFP
Second, those KMT legislators who support a vote of no confidence in the Cabinet are all confident of winning in the next elections. Those less certain of victory have naturally adopted a more hesitant attitude. It will therefore be difficult to integrate intra-party opinions. In contrast, there is no such obstacle to coordinating a recall motion.
Third, even in the event that the no confidence vote succeeds and no immediate progress is taken toward calling new elections, the KMT still must face a DPP president. That is why Lien Chan
Fourth, recalling the president and vice president takes the showdown to the highest level. If the move is successful, the KMT might have an opportunity to take back the reins of power.
As for the PFP, it stands to benefit from either a no confidence or a recall measure. If the recall motion is passed,
Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) power will be significantly reduced. Of the currently eligible candidates, Lien and James Soong (宋楚瑜) have the greatest chance. If Lien and Soong combine forces, the PFP could share in the spoils. Even if Lien and Soong square off against one another, because of his mass appeal and campaigning ability, Soong's chances of winning are still greater than Lien's. A no confidence vote and elections could get the PFP even more seats in the legislature. As long as it can share power with the two major parties, the PFP ends up a winner.
The recently formed opposition alliance is undergoing a leadership struggle. Although Soong already holds the position of "advocate," the KMT has also come out swinging. In order to win leadership status, KMT party chairman Lien personally visited each political party for consultations. Since the recall motion has been adopted as the first wave of attack, being able to win control of the leadership is good "face" for the major opposition party. And should the recall motion succeed, being a leader during the ensuing election campaign will be even more beneficial. Even if the recall fails, the leader will continue directing the second wave of attack.
No matter how one analyzes the opposition's many moves, it is painfully evident that in this struggle, the people of Taiwan will be the losers. We've already spent too much energy on in-fighting. The conflicting interests of the parties have engendered a political upheaval. Opinion polls reflect the people's hopes for political stability, but when the opposition decides to close the door to negotiations and throw its weight behind a recall motion, we become very concerned. As we face the current international situation and changes in cross-strait relations, we need more than ever to consolidate , to strive to find common ground and not to take advantage of the situation for personal benefit.
Wang To is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Scudder Smith
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations