Today President Chen Shui-bian (
Basking in the glory of being the first popularly-elected president, Lee visited Southeast Asia, South Africa, Cornell University and South America. Backed by Taiwan's economic and democratic accomplishments, Lee actively explored the diplomatic frontier and business investment opportunities. Although, in hindsight, these endeavors had very little to do with the fate of Taiwanese investments overseas, they boosted the moral of the people of Taiwan, while raising Taiwan's international visibility.
In the light of criticism about the timing and necessity of Chen's visit, Chen has explained that the the trip is to reciprocate the courtesy of foreign governments in sending delegations to his inauguration, as well as securing diplomatic ties. Actually, from the unstable nature of Taiwan's diplomatic ties with Panama to China's invitation to eight African countries maintaining diplomatic ties with Taiwan to join a cooperative forum, all the indications point to a major shake up in Taiwan's foreign relations.
If we do not counterattack, a domino effect will surely follow and Taiwan will lose all its foreign allies. Chen can hardly sit idly by and watch such a diplomatic crisis takes place. Therefore, he has to play his ace card to stabilize the situation. This is what makes the trip a "Herculean journey," the tough task of salvaging Taiwan's foreign ties.
Before Chen's visit, the foreign minister of Nicaragua reminded Taiwan to carry out its pledge to give US$100 million in aid, triggering heated reaction in Taiwan over "money diplomacy." The event has made Chen's difficult task all the more tricky. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs repeatedly clarified that the president's trip does not involve any plans to give new foreign aid, easing resentment about the foreign aid budget at a time when the domestic budget is tight.
Nevertheless, advanced countries see the donation of economic or humanitarian aid toward undeveloped countries as an international obligation. The US$200 million in foreign aid Taiwan contributes is about 0.07 percent of its GNP, way below the 0.24 percent that is the OECD average. Given its economic prowess, Taiwan really hasn't done as much as it should.
Also, of course, China is relentlessly squeezing Taiwan's room for diplomatic maneuver. The tactic deployed by China is what may be called "big-spender diplomacy (凱子外交)." Ambassador-at-large Loh I-cheng (陸以正) revealed that in 1965 China spent US$500 million to build a railroad for Tanzania. After its completion, very few people use this railroad which depends almost entirely on several hundred Chinese technicians for its maintenance. Now the railroad is on the verge of collapse. This is a classical example of "money diplomacy" under which aid is extended for the sake of it without any regard for reality. Given such spendthrift diplomatic competition from China, Taiwan's foreign aid pails in comparison.
Under escalating threats from China, Chen's trip is actually a response to a provocation of war. In the diplomatic tug-of-war across the Taiwan Strait, many valuable resources have been wasted. A number of countries have also exploited cross-strait competition, inviting bids from both sides and treating the two sides as "big spenders." This buying of diplomatic ties and the auctioning that has now become a feature are simply foolish. If only the two sides could agree to a cease-fire, and apply these resources to domestic development, just imagine the kind of benefits their people would enjoy.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with