I have just read the editorial "A failing grade for Academia Sinica, (page 12, July 14)" and wish to differ with the key point of the article, and I quote: "Anyone who has taught at a university knows that teaching and research are two antagonistic arenas that can never be properly balanced. Professors who are serious about teaching, and devote much of their time to students, hardly do any meaningful research while any professor working hard on research and churning out one paper or book after another cannot devote much time to teaching."
This is an antiquated view of the '60s through the '80s. As a matter of fact it is in teaching, when one has to explain in simplest terms possible a difficult subject, that one gains insight to the fundamental aspects of a research problem. And it is in teaching that one becomes more sensitive to the broader significance of a seemingly highly specialized research topic.
I would not go so far as saying that teachers who do not do exciting research cannot transmit the excitement of pursuing knowledge, but certainly students can be inspired to explore uncharted territory if they are exposed to such activities daily. There are those who prefer to stay in the lab and churn out papers only, but many would like to find ways to encourage the few students who are willing to follow the not-so-lucrative but very satisfying career of a a research scholar.
There are certainly teachers of history, literature or even sciences who, through charisma and oratorical skills, can catch the attention of a large number of students at large lectures and inspire them in one way or another. This is one of the many definitions of "good" teaching.
But there are also those who can teach and inspire a small group of students how to explore new frontiers of knowledge. These are also good teachers. I believe that the latter is the kind of teaching Taiwan sorely needs, in addition to other kinds, and this is what Academia Sinica is trying to offer. I have taught geophysics for more than 30 years in a university.
I enjoy teaching but I cannot be satisfied if I only teach out of books or even recent research articles. I have to engage in research. I can understand the anxiety of the Taiwan universities regarding the graduate initiative of Academia Sinica. They perhaps feel that one slice out of a whole pie for Academia is one slice less for the universities.
But I think Taiwan must face reality: the research community needs new manpower and some innovations may help greatly.
Francis Wu
New York
Zhu Bangzao is an idiot
It appears that Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhu Bangzao (朱邦造) has become the most recent victim of his own, self-styled duplicity. Three weeks ago he pressured authorities in the UK to revoke an invitation granted to former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) to speak at Manchester University and he squelched US critics of China's negotiations with Israel for a US$250 million radar sale by saying no third country had the right to interfere with China's internal affairs. At the same time, he said that China would attempt to bar Lee from traveling to Japan. Now, we know that Israel has called off the sale of AWACS to China under pressure from the US.
Zhu's said after the cancellation of the radar sale that "[no] other country has the right to interfere in the bilateral cooperation that China has with other countries," and that "[any] agreement and understanding between states should be honored."
Were we to bring to light for the vociferous Zhu the inherent hypocrisy of his statements and China's actions, I trust the taste of his foot would be more savory than any attempt he might make to justify his stance.
China's rulers are bent on keeping their great nation divided -- they are an emerging economic and military powerhouse, but their political bungling and paranoia seem better adapted to the workings of the Middle Ages.
Charles McClellan
Kaohsiung
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations