During dinner with a professor from Stanford University and her husband, I was impressed with the husband's very profound understanding of sexual equality.
Upon inquiry, the first explanation he offered was "I have had two very exceptional feminists as wives ... they taught me a lot." In front of his current wife, he described his ex-wife as "talented, an attorney, a profes-sor, a writer ..." His present wife listened with a smile and then interrupted, "Don't forget she is also an artist." The couple talked frankly and comfortably about the "ex."
Such a scene is quite rare in Taiwan society. Usually, we see the ex-spouse as either a shadow from the the past to be avoided and forgotten, or an enemy or target of our relentless attacks.
Why do the two cultures treat separation and parting in such different ways? Perhaps we can begin with an understanding of the different divorce systems.
California has a "no-fault" system, under which, if either party wishes to end the marriage, he or she can file for divorce. The court usually gets involved only when it absolutely has to over matters such as division of community property, alimony payments and custody of children.
The grounds for the divorce itself are of no concern to the court. The emphasis of such a system is "free will." Since a pre-condition to love is mutual affection, if love no longer exists in a marriage built on love, then the will to maintain the marriage is naturally gone. Under the circumstances, there is no need to keep the marriage going against the parties' will.
Divorce in Taiwan can only take place under two circumstances -- "mutual voluntary divorce"(
Many people in Taiwan get a "mutual voluntary divorce" for rather impulsive reasons. For example, rage might have gotten the better of them after learning about their mates' infidelity. Of course, some might have agreed to the divorce in the face of threats, insults or other pressure. Without an equitable division of interests and rights, the couple sign the divorce paper quickly. After they regain their rationality, they often regret their hasty action -- but by then it is too late to do anything about it. The only thing left to do is to vent all the anger and hate on the divorced mate.
As for a court-ordered divorce, one party's refusal to consent to the divorce prevents the court from ordering one, unless the other side has violated one of the "10 commandments" provided in the Family Law. Individual desires are completely ignored. It is also extremely difficult to prove to the court that one's spouse has violated one of the "commandments." This kind of divorce is often a blade that cuts both ways.
The basis for ordering such a divorce is the view that "marriage is a moral responsibility." Unless your spouse has misbehaved in a serious way, this responsibility should not be easily removed. Under such harsh requirements, many couples have continued in unhappy marriages because they cannot get a divorce.
On the other hand, sometimes the "fault-free" side will deliberately refuse to consent to a divorce as a way of punishing the erring spouse. Of course, there are also those who would not agree to a divorce and continue to live with a shell of a marriage for the sake of the children and keeping the family intact.
This polarized system of divorce is actually the culprit for many sub-standard marriages and the breakdown of our culture. To improve the situation and respect an individual's free will, women's groups have proposed adopting legal amendments based on the spirit of California's "no-fault" divorce and a system of separation under which anyone who has been separated from his or her spouse for a period of five years or more may file for divorce.
A pre-condition to a "no-fault" divorce in Taiwan is adequate supplemental legal measures. Taiwan's law is still very incompatible with the principle of sexual equality in areas such as alimony and the division of marital property, although improvements have been made to the law governing the award of custody of children.
Although an amendment on the division of martial property has been submitted to the Legislative Yuan, unless the bill passed is the version endorsed by women's groups, many women will remain unwilling to support separation for fear of losing both their mates and money. The proposed bill provides for protection of one party when the other party sells off marital property.
With increasing social changes, a decreasing number of women are willing to be locked into sub-standard marriages. The solution to our problems, besides supporting the legislation proposed by the women's groups, is an re-evaluation of the meaning of marriage. How do we humanize the institution of marriage? This is perhaps the key to decreasing friction between the sexes.
Su Chien-ling is the chairperson of the Awakening Foundation.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.