For the past 50 years, the return of plundered antiques to their home countries has been a major topic of discussions in museology seminars and of news reports. However, returns remain the exception. Proponents and opponents of returning antiquities appear to be trapped in a game with some very unique rules.
Game participants are the home countries of the plundered items (usually developing countries); the plunderers, who took antiques by force or through colonialization (usually Western countries and their museums); auction companies (representatives of cross-border capitalistic interest groups); the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO,
The first three participants have tried to join the two international organizations mentioned above in order to speak at conferences where the rules are set for the return of plundered antiques. These discussions and conferences put a civilized front on the game and create the illusion that problems may be resolved.
The truth is that the first three participants all have a one-track mind -- they want to win. The Western countries and their museums have tried every possible way to resist returning antiques, in the hopes of maintaining their right to speak on cultural issues deriving from their possession of such items. Take the British Museum for example. It has an endless list of excuses:
* It has been the spokesperson of world civilization and its aim is to promote knowledge of the entire human race.
* It has its own heritage preservation section -- the oldest and the most complete in the world.
* It has promoted the use of its collections by making them available to academic and scholarly research.
* It publishes a variety of materials, holds numerous regular and special exhibitions, lends out collections and puts collections on world tours and provides student research facilities and Web services.
* The museum exists for the whole world's use.
* It has dedicated itself to the preservation and exhibition of human civilization in the past 200 years, a sacred torch that it will continue to carry.
As far as developing countries are concerned, they of course feel the need to stress the cul-tural value of the plundered antiques to their national identity and history. In the hopes of retrieving antiques and installing them in their own museums, they appeal to nationalistic sentiments at home, while lashing out with attacks on colonial imperialism.
Before the recent auction of three precious antiques from the Yuanmingyuan (Summer Palace,
Representatives from the two Chinese companies who eventually won the bidding for the three pieces said their participation had "the approval and support of the Chinese leadership in advance and won praises from the Beijing authorities after the auction." They said the auction "concerns not only the Chinese people's nationalism complex, but also Hong Kong's stability." The three bronze sculptures are to be exhibited in Hong Kong for three days in order that the Hong Kong people can be "educated on patriotism."
These events prove that the Hong Kong auction was no longer a simple antique sale, but had become a political and foreign-affairs incident. Officials from Beijing's State Bureau for the Preservation of Cultural Relics
Auction companies represent a complex global business network comprised of collectors and art dealers all over the world. They are capitalistic in nature and do not intend to be the conscience of human beings.
They claim to obey international auction rules. For example, they hold viewing days the day before an auction during which potential buyers may inspect the quality of the goods to be sold, while owners of lost antiques may also check for any stolen items. However, the houses do not always reveal the source of the items in the collections up for sale. Therefore, buyers can legally possess these antiques.
The book Sotheby's: The Inside Story
After the auction of the Yuanmingyuan antiques, Luo Jia-tong
Of course, the statement was simply cost-free lip service. Extensive media coverage of protests by the Chinese and Hong Kong people caused the antiques to be sold for a price three times greater than their base prices. All told, the two auction companies were the biggest winners.
As the game gradually unfolds, debates over legal, sentimental, historical and political issues are generated. UNESCO and the International Community of Museums, caught between the proponents and opponents, wish to help both sides reach a consensus, so that each member country will have the right to enjoy the cultural heritage of all mankind.
However, both institutions understand the danger posed by international realities and their inability to enforce the rules. Therefore, the reality is that the rule of returning antiques to their home countries is hardly a formal one. Returns are either not car-ried out or dealt with on a case-by-case basis.
In other words, the game rules are still in the process of development. At present, the law remains incapable of resolving the problems surrounding the return of antiques. Greece and Egypt have negotiated for years with the UK over the return of the Elgin's Marbles and the Rosetta Stone. Even with UNESCO acting as a mediator, the parties are far from reaching a consensus or initiating any legal procedure.
There have been many similar cases and most remain unresolved, with neither side budging -- like people who end an argument with the nebulous "I'll get back to you." The efforts of the two international organizations have been futile and quixotic.
In today's civilized world, relatively reasonable mechanisms have been established in many areas for the resolution of international disputes. However, when it comes to the return of plundered antiques, we still abide by the rules of the jungle.
Yui-Tan Chang is director of the Institute of Museology at the National College of the Arts.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry