The most magnificent chapter in the history of Taiwan's demo-cracy movement will come to a close if DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung
By "magnificent," I mean the panoramic scope and vision that took shape during the Kaohsiung Incident -- and centered around the activists involved in Formosa magazine -- of which Lin is a representative figure.
The wisdom and ideals of the "Formosa generation" have become an important asset to the democracy movement. Only time will tell whether the next generation will have the kind of drive and persistence demonstrated by their forebears. In any case, the curtain is now falling on the brilliant performance of this first generation.
Ever since its establishment, the DPP has been led by Kaohsiung Incident victims -- the only exception being its first chair-man, Chiang Peng-chien (江鵬堅).
Yao Chia-wen (姚嘉文), Huang Hsin-chieh (黃信介), Hsu Hsin-liang (許信良), Shih Ming-te (施明德) and Lin all had the dubious distinction of becoming political celebrities in the 1970s. They were pioneers who paid the highest price for their participation in the democracy movement. One salient feature was that this generation were able to introduce a new way of thinking to the movement.
They deeply imbued the movement with their ideas, such as Yao's "new three kingdoms" theory
All of these people were jailed for participating in the demo-cracy movement. Their passion completely washed away the grime covering Taiwan's destiny and painted it anew. The Formosa generation has been in the movement for 30 years -- all the way up to the DPP's victory in the presidential election. Their morale and fighting spirit remains high despite their greying hair. It was with their determination and on their ideas that the DPP developed its breadth and strength of a ruling party.
Whether Lin's retirement will leave a vacuum in the DPP's ideals and legacy will be key to the future of the democracy movement. The Formosa generation's spirit of unity came from their strategic alliances, as people of differing political ideals worked together. In contrast, the party's current unity is built upon power-sharing among factions.
In political movements, there are always tensions and contradictions between ideals and interests. But the litmus test for the DPP's new leaders is whether they can uphold the existing idealism. It takes people of considerable stature and dexterity to strike a balance and make compromises.
The Formosa generation had only one enemy: the KMT. Now, the enemy has diversified. Even other factions within the DPP have become adversaries.
The Formosa generation has completed their mission. They have changed the DPP's long-standing image of an opposition party and written a new chapter in Taiwan's history. It is not possible to hope that they could lead the movement for a thousand more generations.
In particular, Lin -- a man with a deep sense of history -- may choose to step down while things are at their very best, writing an exclamation point as it were, to a magnificent period in history on behalf of his generation. His resignation will be another demonstration of the wisdom of the Formosa generation.
In any case, the second generation should draw inspiration from Lin's sense of propriety, for crises and opportunities are waiting for them to tackle.
Chen Fang-ming is a professor of Chinese literature at National Chi-Nan University.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
Astride an ascended economy and military, with global influence nearing biblical proportions, Xi Jinping (習近平) — general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), chairman of the Central Military Commission and president of the People’s Republic of China — is faithfully heralded, in deeds and imagery, as a benevolent lord, determined to “build a community of common destiny for all mankind.” Rather than leading humanity to this Shangri-La through inspirational virtue a la Mahatma Gandhi or Abraham Lincoln, the CCP prefers a micromanagement doctrine of socialism with Chinese characteristics as the guiding light. A doctrine of Marxist orthodoxy transplanted under a canvas
On Sept. 8, at the high-profile Ketagalan security forum, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) urged countries to deal with the China challenge. She said: “It is time for like-minded countries, and democratic friends in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond, to discuss a framework to generate sustained and concerted efforts to maintain a strategic order that deters unilateral aggressive actions.” The “Taiwan model” to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic provides an alternative to China’s authoritarian way of handling it. Taiwan’s response to the health crisis has made it evident that countries across the world have much to learn from Taiwan’s best practices and if