The political implications for Chiang Yao-chung (
With Chiang's appointment, Ma's team has been nicely incorporated into the "government for all people" (全民政府) -- even though the move itself may be an insult to Ma.
Chiang's appointment as vice chairman of the Public Construction Commission
Although Chiang tried to keep his appointment low profile to save Ma from losing face, he was determined to hand in his resignation to the mayor.
When Ma realized he could do nothing to change Chiang's mind, he put on a long face and expressed his dissatisfaction.
He accused the new government of failing to inform him in advance and subsequently hinted that Chiang lacked a sense of comradeship in giving up his responsibilities of running the MRT system.
But in actuality Chiang was promoted during A-bian's (阿扁) tenure as mayor. Ever since then Chiang and Lin Neng-pai (林能白), the chairman of the Public Construction Commission, have laid a foundation for mutual trust.
Even though Ma appointed Chiang DORTS director general, Chen's effort to promote Chiang was no less than that of Ma.
In addition, Chiang is a technocrat. The MRT line opening may need his supervision, but he could also perform well in the Cabinet-level commission.
In a situation where "he has plenty of room for realizing his ideals whether in the central or Taipei City Government," the political implications for his entering the cabinet have been clear enough.
Before A-bian formed his "government for all people," Ma was calling for party-to-party negotiations.
As A-bian successfully recruited KMT members, Ma's team became a key target for recruiting by the incoming administration. Chiang's appointment to a Cabinet post marks Ma's failure to guard his team.
With the missing piece from Ma's team finally inserted into A-bian's government map, the jigsaw-puzzle of a "government for all people" has been successfully completed.
Ho Jung-hsing is chief of the city desk at the Liberty Times.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
Toward the end of former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) final term in office, there was much talk about his legacy. Ma himself would likely prefer history books to enshrine his achievements in reducing cross-strait tensions. He might see his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Singapore in 2015 as the high point. However, given his statements in the past few months, he might be remembered more for contributing to the breakup of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). We are still talking about Ma and his legacy because it is inextricably tied to the so-called “1992 consensus” as the bedrock of his