Although it was no surprise that the US House of Representatives passed the bill to grant China permanent normal trading relations (PNTR), the margin was rather more comfortable than expected. The Clinton administration need not have been so nervous; in the end, Congress was unlikely to reject a bill that brings such obvious economic benefits to the US.
The outcome is also a relief to most Taiwanese, since we expect that the agreement -- and particularly the Chinese WTO entry that it almost assures -- will bring many benefits to Taiwan as well.
The arguments are well-rehearsed. First, Tai-wanese investors in China will no longer have to worry that the door to their main market will be shut (some 80 percent of the production of Taiwanese-owned factories in China is exported). Second, China's WTO entry should be accompanied by our own, as the House reiterated in an amendment to the PNTR bill. For Taiwan, WTO entry will provide a much-needed forum to manage trade disputes, free from the political specter of China or the lack of diplomatic relations.
However, there is a strong and persistent strain of thought that the benefits of PNTR will extend far beyond this. The claim has been made by proponents of the bill -- from President Bill Clinton to the Dalai Lama -- that allowing Beijing to join the WTO will transform Chinese society, turning China from an isolated, repressive regime into a democratic, peace-loving country with whom genuine partnership -- not the fiasco that currently masquerades under that name -- will be easy to achieve. A "side benefit" is that this democratic China would be less of a bully to Taiwan and the rest of the region.
This thesis rests on a simple chain of logic: free trade promotes economic growth, which leads to the development of a strong middle class, which will inevitably demand democracy. Empirical experience shows this to be relatively sound, since there are essentially no rich countries which are not democracies (Singapore can be discounted as a special case). Nevertheless, we should be beware of applying the analogy unthinkingly to China.
The first and most important qualifier is that China is still a very poor country. The democratic transitions in South Korea and here in Taiwan are most often cited as evidence for the theory. But in both these cases, the breakthrough only occurred after per capita incomes reached a level that will not be seen in China, even at current rates of growth, for decades. We should note that people have been predicting the "inevitable" political reform ever since Deng Xiaoping
Therefore, even taking the most optimistic assumptions, the promised change in its political culture is not likely to be achieved for a generation. In the meantime, China will be getting steadily stronger. This is not very heartening for those in the region, especially Taiwan, who are already feeling pressure from Beijing.
And there are less rosy scenarios. Social unrest in China shows no sign of cooling down and WTO entry, at least in the near term, is likely to widen the gap between the haves and the have-nots, raising the risk of internal disturbances that could derail economic development. And the rigidity of China's current political system means that a political crisis cannot be ruled out. The more extreme possibilities include civil war.
In short, PNTR and WTO entry will certainly bring economic benefits to China and its trading partners, including Taiwan, and they are to be welcomed. But we should not believe that they are a panacea for the many political and security issues that remain to be addressed.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations