Comparing the inaugural ceremony for Taiwan's 10th president with similar ceremonies in the PRC is interesting. The ceremony in Taiwan was full of pomp and circumstance, both in the formal exchange of power and the speeches by President Chen Shui-bian
The Taipei celebration and Chen's speech both had a Taiwanese feel. Chen may have mentioned the ROC many times in his speech, but the ROC has been "localized." Chen also refer-red to Taiwan as "forever the mother" and called himself "Taiwan's son," remarks that could not have come from the KMT. Having the national anthem sung by Chang Hui-mei
Chen's address mentioned all the issues of concern to the public, including political, economic, community and environmental topics. His comments about a small government were surprising, since former opposition parties often abuse their newfound powers out of excitement. The DPP, which started out as a grassroots movement and has a socialist tinge to it, has long advocated the realization of social equality through administrative measures. A small government run by the DPP would reduce corruption.
But the pressure of recent Chinese threats meant the focus of attention was Chen's remarks about cross-strait policy.
Ahead of the inauguration, China's state media launched new attacks against Chen in a bid to influence his speech. On May 15, a People's Daily editorial stated that Chen could not avoid the "one China" principle and on the 17th, the Xinhua News Agency editorial claimed that the path of Lee Teng-hui
Just hours after Chen's speech, Beijing claimed he had avoided the "one China" principle and lacked both sincerity and good-will. Clearly Beijing was not satisfied with Chen's principled, yet "soft" approach, but it seemed to harbor hope for him. China's fiercest criticism was reserved for "some of those in power in Taiwan, who are guilty of being "resolutely in favor of independence for Taiwan." Who "they" are, no one knows.
This stubborn and unrealistic response will only continue to drive a wedge between China and Taiwan. There is no hope for the two countries merging. One must engulf the other. In his speech Chen may have said that the people across the Taiwan Strait share the same ancestral, cultural and historical background, but differences are mounting due to the prolonged separation. There are cultural commonalities between Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Macau, but there are also salient differences.
Taiwan has undoubtedly created an economic and political miracle and will continue to manufacture miracles. China,however, refuses to give up one-party rule, insists its government structure is the best in the world and refuses to reform. How could Taiwan unify with a country that retains such an outdated system of government? Unification with China would send the miracles Taiwan has achieved over the past five decades into the grave.
Paul Lin is a political commentator residing in the US.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry