Yesterday, Chen Shui-bian (
When it comes to political development, the two sides across the Taiwan Strait have gone in opposite directions over the past 12 years. Taiwan has been moving toward the universal values of freedom, democracy and respect for human rights, while China has been going against international trends with its anti-democratic, anti-human rights behavior. To some extent at least, China has provided a sharp contrast that helped Lee win the name "Mr Democracy" in the international media.
On one hand, Chen must continue to safeguard the interests of the Taiwanese people, building on what Lee has accomplished. But on the other hand, he must not be too provocative toward China. Hence, he has repeatedly emphasized "freedom, democracy and human rights" and promised to contribute more pro-actively to safeguarding international human rights. These have now become his weapons.
Chen also said that the two sides also respect the people's will and their freedom of choice. In light of this, China will have to watch out for possible counterproductive effects before it criticizes Chen.
Thanks to mass media and the Internet, tens of thousands of people in China will put Chen's every word and sentence under microscopic scrutiny. Chen's emphasis on freedom, democracy and human rights hit the Chinese authorities where it hurts. But the ideas may very well strike a chord among the populace in much of China. Chinese scholars have to toe the official line and criticize Chen, as in the statement from the State Council's Taiwan Affairs Office, which criticized Chen for what they call a lack of sincerity in describing "one China" as something "for the future." However, we believe Chinese will certainly hope that their own nation will one day walk Taiwan's path, realizing freedom and democracy and ensuring human rights.
We believe that Chen's proclamations on freedom and democracy are more important than his "five no's" in the inaugural speech. The "five no's" are mere short-term objectives for cross-strait relations, while democracy and human rights are humanity's eternal values, which do not change with the passage of time or political regimes.
On the other hand, Chen emphasized in his speech that it was a "victory of the people," that "the people are the true masters of the state," and that "the people are the masters and shareholders of the state." Chen also added that the historical wounds endured by the people on both sides of the Strait should serve to lay a foundation for mutual understanding. In other words, no matter how the Chinese authorities try to pressure and criticize Chen, Taiwan can still "place its hope in the people of China," adroitly turning around China's phrase "placing its hope in the people of Taiwan" (
Chen's keynote line "Taiwan stands up" reminds us of what Mao Zedong (毛澤東) said famously at Tienanmen Square: "The people of China have stood up." What is the difference between the two? One is a president elected by the people, the other was a leader who ruled as a despot in the name of the people.
We hope the Beijing authorities will clearly see and abide by today's international trends as well as universal values. Any "future one China" will be as far off as ever as long as the wide political gap between the two sides remains.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under