Business profits versus human rights. Thus do critics of trade between the US and China frame the debate. But freer trade is likely to advance human rights as well as boost business profits.
For years, the US Congress has voted annually on permitting "normal trading relations" (NTR)with China. Now the Clinton administration is advocating permanent status (PNTR), which would allow China to enter the WTO. Lobbying furiously for a yes vote is American business. Without doubt trade with China, now about US$95 billion both ways, is economically beneficial: Some 200,000 Americans are directly employed providing exports to China.
Much more would be possible with a more open economy. Western firms, investors and exporters alike, have found China to be a tough market. Companies cite rising labor costs, market access restrictions, high taxes and customs duties, and corruption.
But PNTR critics don't care about increased profits. Newspaper columnist Abe Rosenthal cites "Beijing's human rights crimes." The AFL-CIO denounces Chinese labor practices (while actually worrying most about increased imports).
The Weekly Standard magazine complains about China's "threats to attack Taiwan." Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy worries about Chinese nuclear developments posing "a new threat to this country." Obviously it would be easier to grant PNTR if China was capitalist and democratic. It is neither. But the most important question is: what policy, economic integration or isolation, is most likely to move China towards capitalism and democracy?
To ask the question is to answer it. Membership in the WTO might not sweep away all of Beijing's economic restrictions, but despite determined internal opposition, the regime has made significant market-opening concessions.
As my Cato Institute colleague Mark Groombridge puts it, "A vote in favor of extending PNTR to China is a vote for reform of the Chinese economy." Indeed, the US has received more than just promises.
Beijing has begun revamping the banking sector. Government officials are planning to relax investment and trade controls, and Chinese companies are maneuvering to better meet anticipated international competition. Although market reforms do not guarantee greater respect for human rights, economic prosperity brought increased pressure for democracy in such countries as South Korea and Taiwan.
In China itself political decentralization and personal autonomy have been expanding. Particularly dramatic has been the growth of private associations and companies. The communist leadership will undoubtedly resist future democratization; in fact, military and security agencies resolutely resisted the WTO accord. However, the greater people's access to the tools of freedom, such as computers, the larger the number of private power centers, such as businesses, and the increased autonomy of subordinate governments, such as the coastal trading provinces, the greater the pressure for change.
Isolation would merely give the central authorities a pretext to crack down. Notably, religious groups like Ned Graham's East Gates Ministries support continued trade with China. Finally, while Beijing could end up as an enemy of the US, such a result is not preordained. China threatens not the US, but US domination of East Asia. The best response would be to step back and encourage US allies to defend their own interests. Anyway, since Beijing's future is not predetermined, Washington should adopt policies, such as freer trade, more likely to encourage friendship than hostility. It is for this reason that Taiwan, despite China's persistent threats, supports Beijing's entry in the WTO.
The silliest argument against PNTR is that Chinese imports would overwhelm US industry. In fact, American workers are far more productive than their Chinese counterparts. Moreover, Beijing's manufacturing exports to the US remain small -- about half the level of those from Mexico. PNTR would create far more export opportunities for American than Chinese concerns. Estimates of the likely increase in US exports range up to US$13 billion annually.
There is another issue: The right to trade is a basic human right. Fundamental to one's humanity is the freedom to peacefully exchange the product of one's labor with others. If Americans want to buy, say, toys, clothes, or Christmas ornaments from Chinese rather than US firms, they have a moral right to do so. That trade should be free does not mean anything goes. Congress can rightly restrict trade with security implications: Americans need not improve the accuracy of Chinese ICBM's, for instance. And goods produced by forced labor in prison camps do not represent free trade.
Moreover, US officials should challenge Beijing to respect the rights of its citizens. US taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize the Chinese government through the Export-Import Bank, Overseas Private Investment Corporation and foreign aid agencies. Most Americans -- along with citizens of countries throughout East Asia -- want a freer, more democratic China. Granting PNTR to Beijing would make that more likely.
Doug Bandow is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute in Washington and a former special assistant to President Ronald Reagan.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs