The US and `one China'
Cao Chang-ching's objections to President-elect Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) wandering away from Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) "state-to-state" position are completely justified ("Has Chen already failed `one China' test?" May 5, Page 13). In particular, his statement that "`one China' and dragons are both imaginary" prompts me to note another misconception -- the imaginary "one China policy" Beijing ascribes to the US.
Since the 1972 Shanghai Communique, China has misled the world that the US' "one China" policy is: "There is but one China and Taiwan is part of China." The deliberate confusion was created by continual misinterpretations of the word "acknowledge," which was confused with "recognize." As a result, the US position of: "we acknowledge the fact that you are both saying the same thing" was mistaken for "we recognize that what you say is also what we believe."
Reflecting on the reality of the "special state-to-state" relationship, the US Congress last July passed Resolution 166, expressing the sense of the Congress that the adoption a "one China, one Taiwan policy," with the following reasoning: "Whereas the United States `one China policy' was rendered obsolete by Taiwan's policy shift and no longer reflects reality, for the Taiwan side of the Taiwan Strait has now effectively stated that it no longer holds the belief that Taiwan is part of China."
Taitzer Wang
Cincinnati, Ohio
28 years of `two states' Few have noticed that Lee Teng-hui's (李登輝) "two states" statement has actually been implemented by the US government for the past 28 years. In the 1972 Shanghai Communique, the Chinese side reaffirmed its position by saying: "[t]he Government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legal government of China ... The Chinese Government firmly opposes any activities which aim at the creation of `one China, one Taiwan,' `one China, two governments,' `two Chinas,' an `independent Taiwan' or advocate that the status of Taiwan remains to be determined." The US side declared: "[t]he United States `acknowledges' that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China. The United States Government does not challenge that position." At the time the Shanghai Communique was released, the US officially recognized the Republic of China as the "sole legal government" of the whole of China. However, in the communique, it "acknowledges" and does not "challenge" that the People's Republic of China is the "sole legal government" of China. By combining these two facts, we can see that the communique is the original source of "two Chinas." Taiwan's President-elect should utilize "their communique" to support "our two states." Lloyd Sheng-pao Fan
Brisbane, Australia
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.