The outrageous escape from the Taichung Detention Center has certainly provided the most riveting story of recent days. Most alarming for most people is the ease with which the two men escaped: the idea that so many criminals might be guarded so loosely is bound to send shivers through any society.
Prisons perform many functions, but perhaps the most fundamental is the containment of dangerous elements, to prevent them from repeating their crimes, or from taking revenge on those who put a stop to them. With the revelation that a mere three guards were responsible for supervising a facility of over 2,000 inmates, and that their physical security equipment is obviously inadequate to compensate, this basic function must now be called into question.
It is obvious that a complete reexamination of all the penal facilities in the country is urgently required. It is entirely likely that the Taichung Detention Center is not the only prison that falls well short of standards. A program will be required to overhaul deficiencies of equipment, staffing, and training, and it will need to be backed up by a greatly strengthened mechanism for ongoing supervision.
It is normal that such a case would cause the downfall of the Minister of Justice. Felicitously, that will not be necessary in the present case, since there are only 10 days left in the incumbent minister's term. Even better, whereas in the past frequent Cabinet reshuffles usually produced only cosmetic change, we now have the prospect of a genuine house-cleaning.
Perhaps it would be unfair to add expectations of prison reform on incoming minister Chen Ting-n(陳定南). After all, he has an extremely long list of "priority" projects already crowding his agenda, any one of which would be a daunting task.
But if anything good comes from the debacle in Taichung, it may well be a final parting kick at the old way of doing things. By graphically reinforcing in the public mind the need for real change in the ministry, this incident may give Chen a helpful boost. In which case, not a moment too soon.
What about reform of the DPP?
That the KMT must reform has been taken by everybody as obvious, that the DPP might need reform much less so. On Sunday, however, DPP heavyweight Chiou I-jen
Chiou's suggestion makes perfect sense but it seems unlikely to come about for the very reason that it is so badly needed.
The DPP's problem has always been its factionalism -- itself a result of the party's origins as a "big tent" including almost everybody opposed to the KMT whatever their other ideological dissimilarities -- and the CSC has traditionally been the place where these factions competed against each other to set party policy. The result has often been paralysis in policy formation because of the impossibility of getting a consensus between widely disparate elements. Now Chiou wants to use this arena for real politics rather than factional bickering.
It's a good idea but it doesn't just mean passing new regulations about the CSC's make up. Rather, the DPP would have to change its whole party culture. The necessity of providing a strong direction to the new government might be an impetus, but don't expect the factions to surrender without a fight.
In 1955, US general Benjamin Davis Jr, then-commander of the US’ 13th Air Force, drew a maritime demarcation line in the middle of the Taiwan Strait, known as the median line. Under pressure from the US, Taiwan and China entered into a tacit agreement not to cross the line. On July 9, 1999, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) described cross-strait relations as a “special state-to-state” relationship. In response, Beijing dispatched People’s Liberation Army (PLA) aircraft into the Taiwan Strait, crossing the median line for the first time since 1955. The PLA has begun to regularly traverse the line. On Sept. 18 and 19, it
Midday in Manhattan on Wednesday, September 16, was sunny and mild. Even with the pandemic’s “social distancing” it was a perfect day for “al fresco” dining with linen tablecloths and sidewalk potted palms outside one of New York City’s elegant restaurants. Two members of the press, outfitted with digital SLR cameras and voice recorders, were dispatched by The Associated Press to cover a rare outdoor diplomatic meeting on one of these New York streets. American diplomat Kelly Craft, Chief of the United States Mission to the United Nations, lunched in the open air with Taiwan’s ambassador-ranked representative in New York, James
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) recently declared that aggression and expansionism have never been in the Chinese nation’s “genes.” It is almost astonishing that he managed to say it with a straight face. Aggression and expansionism obviously are not genetic traits, but they have defined Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) tenure. Xi, who in some ways has taken up the expansionist mantle of Mao Zedong (毛澤東), is attempting to implement a modern version of the tributary system that Chinese emperors used to establish authority over vassal states: submit to the emperor, and reap the benefits of peace and
Unlike its previous practice of disclosing the latest activities of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in a press release, the Ministry of National Defense has in the past few weeks followed the model of the Japanese Ministry of Defense. When carrying out surveillance and reconnaissance of the nation’s waters and airspace, it has posted real-time military activity updates on its Chinese-language Web site, explaining with text and graphs the responses and measures taken by the nation’s armed forces. The disclosed information on PLA activities show that the military is capable of maintaining regional security and safeguarding a free and open