James C.K. Shen (
First, let's talk about "human clones." Ever since the first "cloned sheep" appeared in 1997, many other mammals of all sizes have been successfully cloned with human beings the main exception. Though the issue has been widely discussed, most people still don't know that "human clones" and "test-tube babies" are basically the same except that one reproduces asexually, while the other breeds sexually, both having the eggs reach external fertilization, or activation. Therefore, "cloning" should be formally called "asexual reproduction."
In asexual reproduction, the filial generation is identical genetically to the parental generation -- equivalent to a producing replica. Creatures benefit from evolution through reproduction, asexual and sexual. Whether people are willing to breed generations identical to themselves, giving up the opportunities to breed "products of love" with their loved ones doesn't need to be discussed here. The point is that "human clones," like test-tube babies, don't grow up in "test-tubes," and that they must be implanted into the wombs of the mothers for 280 days of pregnancy. Even after the "human clone" is born, it will not necessarily be your duplicated self. The gap between your generations -- your age, physical strength, experience and thought -- will always be there, just like parents and children.
As far as "cloning" technology is concerned, I don't believe it would be easy to use it to produce transplantable organs. It is one thing to make animals grow an extra ear or arm. However, a living organism is required to grow an organ which has a complete structure and functions. It is still impossible at the current stage to cultivate a mouse embryo, which normally needs 21 days of pregnancy into a fully developed mouse -- and this isn't even close the the requirements for developing a human being. If women were to go through 10 months' pregnancy only to provide an "instrument" for a transplantable organ, it would never be accepted by the public. However, is it possible to solve the problem by making it "headless?"
Since I was not present at Shen's lecture, I don't want to garble any statements from his speech. However, making "headless human clones" appear in the public media seems to mislead more than educate. First of all, I have no idea where the "headless human clone" speculated by Shen is to grow. It definitely would not be possible to grow inside the mother's body. Even though it might be successfully cultivated outside the body, when will it be suitable for transplant? Additionally, let's drop the issue whether being "headless" would avoid ethical criticism. From the viewpoint of physiology, systems cannot function without a nervous system -- of which the brain is the most vital organ.
Research in basic sciences usually does not take applications into account, and at the same time, scientists always hold a "confidently uncertain" stance, in the hope that any problems can be resolved in the future. However, scientists should maintain their duty and not make unreal "predictions." Facing layer after layer of complex structure and functions in the human body -- from molecules, cells, organs and systems to the individual human body -- modern molecular biology is destined to be disappointed if it holds the belief that by simply understanding how to control genes it will come to know the complexity of all creatures.
Pan Jenn-Tser is professor in the Institute of Physiology at National Yang-Ming University.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry