James C.K. Shen (
First, let's talk about "human clones." Ever since the first "cloned sheep" appeared in 1997, many other mammals of all sizes have been successfully cloned with human beings the main exception. Though the issue has been widely discussed, most people still don't know that "human clones" and "test-tube babies" are basically the same except that one reproduces asexually, while the other breeds sexually, both having the eggs reach external fertilization, or activation. Therefore, "cloning" should be formally called "asexual reproduction."
In asexual reproduction, the filial generation is identical genetically to the parental generation -- equivalent to a producing replica. Creatures benefit from evolution through reproduction, asexual and sexual. Whether people are willing to breed generations identical to themselves, giving up the opportunities to breed "products of love" with their loved ones doesn't need to be discussed here. The point is that "human clones," like test-tube babies, don't grow up in "test-tubes," and that they must be implanted into the wombs of the mothers for 280 days of pregnancy. Even after the "human clone" is born, it will not necessarily be your duplicated self. The gap between your generations -- your age, physical strength, experience and thought -- will always be there, just like parents and children.
As far as "cloning" technology is concerned, I don't believe it would be easy to use it to produce transplantable organs. It is one thing to make animals grow an extra ear or arm. However, a living organism is required to grow an organ which has a complete structure and functions. It is still impossible at the current stage to cultivate a mouse embryo, which normally needs 21 days of pregnancy into a fully developed mouse -- and this isn't even close the the requirements for developing a human being. If women were to go through 10 months' pregnancy only to provide an "instrument" for a transplantable organ, it would never be accepted by the public. However, is it possible to solve the problem by making it "headless?"
Since I was not present at Shen's lecture, I don't want to garble any statements from his speech. However, making "headless human clones" appear in the public media seems to mislead more than educate. First of all, I have no idea where the "headless human clone" speculated by Shen is to grow. It definitely would not be possible to grow inside the mother's body. Even though it might be successfully cultivated outside the body, when will it be suitable for transplant? Additionally, let's drop the issue whether being "headless" would avoid ethical criticism. From the viewpoint of physiology, systems cannot function without a nervous system -- of which the brain is the most vital organ.
Research in basic sciences usually does not take applications into account, and at the same time, scientists always hold a "confidently uncertain" stance, in the hope that any problems can be resolved in the future. However, scientists should maintain their duty and not make unreal "predictions." Facing layer after layer of complex structure and functions in the human body -- from molecules, cells, organs and systems to the individual human body -- modern molecular biology is destined to be disappointed if it holds the belief that by simply understanding how to control genes it will come to know the complexity of all creatures.
Pan Jenn-Tser is professor in the Institute of Physiology at National Yang-Ming University.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.