Amid fierce competition to develop Chinese-language content for the Internet, what is the appropriate role of Taiwan's government? Many government bodies have already delegated Internet resources through administrative authority and legislation. As a result, what was once free access to the Internet is becoming increasingly more expensive. Internet users' interests have been short changed. The development of the Internet in Taiwan is increasingly being permeated by corruption. In light of this, a "Basic Internet Law" is needed to protect the public's fundamental rights and privileges.
The Directorate General of Telecommunications denies people the right to freely operate private service telecommunications networks (PSTN) by requiring steep minimum qualifications and inviting "experts" to evaluate applicants' qualifications. But the amount of start-up capital needed and a reasonable way to manage a PSTN are issues to be decided by the market, rather than the so-called experts.
Telecommunications technology develops at a rapid rate. As a result, the actual start-up capital needed to operate a PSTN is declining. Under the circumstances, what the government must do is nurture fair competition, rather than having the existing major players continue monopolizing the industry.
The Electronic Signature Act deprives people of the right to serve as authorities capable of certifying electronic signatures by requiring government approval of the authorities' and regulation of their business operations. The only commodity sold by these authorities is public trust. Public trust accumulates over time, rather than through government approval. Plus, people are typically distrustful of the government in most democratic countries. How then can the government help a certified authority win public trust? This exercise of government power only results in market monopolies.
Some foreign experts have pointed out that, as a result of the rapid change in the Internet industry, the government is neither capable nor required to set any policies for the industry. However, the Industrial Development Bureau has recently published an Internet industry policy in which it listed security certification as a key issue. Internet security is a matter to be handled by the Internet users themselves. No one wants to have his or her personal information misappropriated on the Internet. This need to safeguard information would naturally lead to a new industry to foster Internet security.
The way people intrude on other people's information over the Internet is constantly changing. Under the circumstances, a formal security standard would accomplish nothing except informing the would-be intruders of how to outsmart the security system. A small minority of scholars prefers a security certification system under which they themselves would serve as certification authorities. Thereby, in the days to come, they would be able to live in luxury by simply stamping their approval on a daily basis. The bureau's establishment of a certification system is due to the influence of conglomerates interested in reaping profits from the system.
More than 30 years ago, Taiwanese and Indians were the two largest ethnic groups in America's information industry. Now, Taiwan's information hardware industry and India's information software industry both play extremely important roles worldwide.
However, Taiwan's software industry has failed to take flight. Why couldn't we catch up with India? Because Taiwan's government allowed a monopoly of the software industry. The principle of fair competition was seriously breached because government contracts were monopolized and market competition suppressed. How then can we allow monopolies to exist in the Internet industry?
The promulgation of an "Internet Basic Law" would primarily eliminate the existing monopolies and prevent the emergence of new ones.
Y. G. Tang is a professor of computer science and information at National Taiwan University.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and