Many politicians like to publicize their administrative achievements by saying how much work they have done for the people. Statements like "I planned the construction of this street," or "that sewer was done under my direction" are frequently heard. It sounds as if public works projects are rewards granted by politicians.
Such comments sound convincing. As a result, many simple-minded Taiwanese feel grateful to politicians or consider them caring and hard working because new street lights are set up or streets are properly paved. However, such thoughts are totally wrong.
The funds for public construction projects come not from politicians themselves, but from the taxpayers. Politicians who take credit for streets and bridges show that they have forgotten who the master of a country should be.
Let's take a look at some statistics. Government expenditures on public construction can be represented by the fixed capital formation in the national income account. This amounted to NT$184.8 billion in 1989. The figure increased to NT$350.4 billion in 1992.
In 1993, the year James Soong
Given that the government spent 2.5 times more money, it is only natural that more public works were completed at that time. But the people mistakenly attributed such results to officials working particularly hard. The truth, however, was that the government had more money to spend. Why? One reason was that our people worked hard, so the gross national product almost doubled during that period.
Most of the money spent by the government comes from either taxpayers or revenues received from selling government-owned assets. Sometimes the government simply borrows money, which needs to be returned later through money raised via tax hikes or selling government-owned properties. In other words, public works are built with the people's money.
My point is that there is no need for people to feel grateful to politicians who build sewers and roads for us. On the contrary, we should carefully watch to see whether politicians have wasted or embezzled our money or whether politicians use construction budgets to buy off voters.
Chen Po-chih is professor of economics at National Taiwan University.
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,
RSS