Letters

Saturday, Feb 12, 2000, Page 8

In a recent letter ("Multiple tongues a hindrance" Feb. 2, Page 8), Michael Turton said that in Kenyan schools "local languages were forbidden, just as Taiwanese was 30 years ago [in Taiwan]. This was a reasonable policy, and could easily be applied here."

Turton also stated that English should become a medium of instruction in Taiwanese schools, as it is in many formerly-colonized African societies, claiming that this practice helps to enhance internationalization.

Turton did not mention that the use of colonial languages in Africa has been widely associated with low levels of educational achievement. Indeed, a large body of research suggests that children learn basic subjects and are less likely to drop out of school when their native languages are used as mediums of instruction.

In short, the policy of using what are essentially foreign languages as mediums of instruction are likely to have contributed to the high rate of educational failure which exists in many African societies, and are therefore one reason why these countries actually lag well behind much of the world in terms of internationalization and development.

Turton also claims that Hong Kong and Singapore have a "significant advantage" over Taiwan in international commerce due to their "mastery of English." Aside from a lack of logic in comparing Taiwan with two tiny city-states, which both happen to be former British colonies, Turton also fails to mention that Taiwan outperformed both places during the recent Asian economic crisis.

Furthermore, the use of English in Hong Kong schools has recently been reduced, in part because of research suggesting that students there were failing to learn either English or Cantonese properly.

Finally, as for the implication that it would be "reasonable" to return to the policy of forbidding local languages, it is my impression that it is precisely these kind of policies which the people of Taiwan do not ever wish to return to.

Matthew Ward
Taipei