According to many media reports, supporters of KMT presidential candidate Lien Chan (連戰) hope President Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) will give up the party chairmanship before his term is up.
Various signs appear to indicate that Lien is inclined to accept the idea. But even if Lien's camp has such a proposal in mind, it is not clear what Lien himself is really thinking.
However, even if Lien has thought of it, now is not the time for him to make his intention known to the public.
There are various reasons why the KMT's Lien-Siew ticket has had such a lackluster showing in the polls.
Some analysts think a primary reason is that Lien cannot escape from Lee's shadow.
Furthermore, many of Lee's recent speeches are perceived as being beneficial to Chen Shui-bian (
These speeches have provoked many complaints to Lee from Lien's camp.
Lien's supporters know how hard he has tried to increase his popularity. We can see the improvements he has made.
For example, he is showing more friendliness and naturalness when appearing in public and his public speaking skills have greatly improved.
Often accused of not understanding public opinion, he has tried to offer policies corresponding to the public's needs.
Normally, these positive changes would have boosted the popularity ratings of any candidate, but the results have been far from satisfactory in Lien's case.
In my opinion, Chen has benefited the most from the opinion polls. He has the image of a reformer and apparently no one will stand in his way when he implements reforms.
Lien has never been able to create a reformer image for himself. What makes it worse is that he has a backseat driver -- Lee.
Everyone has doubts about how much change Lien really could effect if he were to be elected.
Though feeling helpless, Lien's camp says things like "Lien Chan has his own opin-ions," or "if Lien Chan is elected, he will not be Lee Teng-hui's puppet."
They even say that Lien could be another Anwar Sadat, hoping to reassure the public about their man's determination to shake off Lee's influence.
But how can you ask others to believe something that has no guarantee of being true? Who would have such confidence?
Skeptics demand Lien demonstrate his own appeal and his own ideas right now, but it would appear that Lien lacks the guts to do so.
We might say the request is unfair, but it is not that unreasonable.
On the other hand, imagine that Lien suddenly loses his meekness and attacks Lee. Wouldn't this be rather awkward?
The votes he might win by doing so are probably less than those he might lose. The tactic is not feasible.
What would be the most beneficial to Lien is for Lee to quit the party chairmanship yet continue campaigning for his vice-president.
This is what Lien's camp wants most of all.
Is Lee willing to resign ahead of schedule? Don't think of how tightly Lee clings to his power, that is not the real worry.
What Lien's camp is really concerned about is that if Lee's resignation does not win votes for Lien, the KMT would not only lose their political power right away, but also lose an influential figure to organize the party.
Any smart person should understand that for Lee, whoever wins the election will be fine by him as long as it isn't Soong.
So why would he want to run such a huge risk of losing his power just to help Lien right now?
Chou Tien-jui is the chairman of the board of directors at Power News.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations