On the third day of the millennium, there they were again -- fistfights in the Legislative Yuan.
Island of advanced technology? Island of humanity? Government of high efficiency? These are the goals that Taiwan set to usher in the new millennium, but unfortunately, it was the fisticuffs in the parliament that kicked off the new year.
Taiwan's political scene is marred by "black gold" politics -- the involvement of gangsters, corruption and illegal financial transactions.
Looking back at the disasters of the past few years -- the severe damage caused by the 921 earthquake, the collapse of Lincoln Mansions and the rockslide caused by the Typhoon Herb -- natural catastrophes have clearly proven that public construction and environmental issues have to be take seriously.
What is wrong with Taiwan? Where is Taiwan heading in this new millennium?
A lot of attention has been paid recently to information technology and bio-technology as the two major industries that will keep Taiwan abreast of other countries. But are they the be all and end-all?
High-tech development should be concurrent with the development of "social software" such as efficiency, quality and the ability to think both critically and rationally. A country should also be equipped with "social hardware" or long-term planning for regional development, public infrastructure and ecological maintenance. An ideal high-tech country should have all these features. Does Taiwan?
The drive towards high technology in advanced countries has brought up social problems such as unemployment, ecological damage and cracks in the social welfare system.
Taiwan is a society facing risks from high-tech development and globalization problems. At the same time, it is full of political tumors caused by "black gold" politics that not only erode its social and political bases but are ruining its future.
If it ever wants to have a clear future, Taiwan has to rid itself of a political system plagued by bid-rigging by gangsters, poor quality public construction and a government corrupted by involvement with business. It also has to be willing to squarely tackle the risk issues brought about by technology.
We have to be willing to admit that Taiwan has its own special problems -- based on its social mores and political infrastructure -- that if left unresolved will make it hard to either compete in the evolving global economy or to build a national and international identity.
Otherwise Taiwan will remain a country known only for its manufacturing -- not for innovation -- a fate that places it risk of being matched, even surpassed by China and Southeast Asian nations. A fate that would also leave it at risk of continuing to sacrifice its environment for the sake of industrial development.
Technological innovation is not just about industry. It is necessary for the systematic development of a country's political, economical, social and cultural structure. Any single weak link in the chain will affect the power of innovation.
In trying to rectify a system corrupted by "black gold" politics, beside political reforms carried out by the government, the most important element is citizens increasing their awareness of what is going on around them.
That is to say, if we ask a new government to rebuild Taiwan into a high-tech society, then we should also take steps to stop power struggles at the community level -- a crucial feature both for rebuilding society and eliminating "black gold."
Surveys show the people of Taiwan hate "black gold" politics; political corruption has been pushed to the level that no one is willing to tolerate anymore.
But the big question is whether we, as a society, can move from the feeling that "we can't take it anymore" to concrete measures to finally eradicate the problem.
Chou Kuei-tien is an associate professor of sociology at Tamkang University.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry