The China Times reported last Thursday that a number of legislators have established venture capital firms and then pressured state-owned banks to invest as much as NT$10 billion in the firms. Legislators' blatant misuse of their powers to secure lucrative investments from bankers is enough to make one's blood boil, but equally worrying is the lack of relevant laws.
What is a venture capital fund? It refers to a private fund set up to invest in new high-tech start- ups. The funds involve a great deal of risk, however, due to the nature of their investments.
High-tech firms have developed rapidly over the past decade and are now competing neck and neck with traditional firms. Some people have therefore expanded the definition of venture capital investments to include investments in any unlisted start-up company regardless of their tech level.
Investment in these traditional firms should be called "direct investment" or "investment in unlisted companies," in order to emphasize that the investment is not conducted indirectly through the stock market.
The role of venture capital firms is to make efficient use of idle private capital to develop small enterprises. Venture capital funds can be likened to an "accelerator," in that their role is to select promising firms, rapidly develop them, get them market-listed, and then search for new firms to develop.
The funds are an effective method of bringing together venture capital, high technology, and human capital and result in the creation of many highly competitive tech firms.
Most venture capital companies invest in unlisted, high-tech companies with large growth potential. Moreover, the goal of venture capital funds' investments is not to retain stock in the companies or collect stock dividends, but instead to realize large gains by first infusing large amounts of capital and expertise to induce rapid growth in the companies, and then selling their stake in the firms.
It seems the legislators in question hope to make high-risk investments through venture capital funds using both official and unofficial channels. The official channels refer to investments in the OTC's "second board" due to open in June, which will allow investment in high-tech firms based on traditional investment and management practices. This would serve as to "accelerate" the growth of high-tech firms in Taiwan.
The unofficial method refers to venture capital firms that dangle a small amount of capital in front of legislators, who then help the firms by pressuring banks, and finally the public at large to invest in the firms. The high risk of the investments, however, could in effect mortgage society and government against the investments.
Capital could be invested preferentially into legislator-controlled, unlisted companies, and if any problems emerge, the firms could be dumped onto their major shareholders: the state-owned banks, government and society. It could be the start of another monster the likes of the Hungyuan Investment Company (
OTC's "second board" has yet to be established, meaning there is still a legal gray area regarding venture capital firms. Further, risk hedging mechanisms have yet to be set up, and laws and regulations have still not been passed.
Moreover, it is an election year, and various forces are doing their best to ramp up investment in companies under their control. Their strategy may lead to mammoth profits if they are able to get their companies rolling before the opening of the "second board," and then take advantage of the lax qualifications for listing.
It usually takes a venture capital company six to seven years to select a unlisted high-tech firm, invest in it and get it listed.
With the frenetic speculation on the TAIEX, exploding "land-mine stocks" and legislators in need of huge election war chests every three years, this writer is pessimistic about venture capital firms controlled by legislators.
But we shouldn't make a negative judgement against all venture capital firms. Rather, we should focus our concern on whether government regulations for the industry are complete and fully implemented, and whether the public is informed about the nature of these firms. In a market economy, investors must bear a portion of responsibility for their investment decisions.
Chiu Chen-miao is a doctoral student at the at Sun Yat-sen Graduate Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities at National Chengchi University.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry