The China Times reported last Thursday that a number of legislators have established venture capital firms and then pressured state-owned banks to invest as much as NT$10 billion in the firms. Legislators' blatant misuse of their powers to secure lucrative investments from bankers is enough to make one's blood boil, but equally worrying is the lack of relevant laws.
What is a venture capital fund? It refers to a private fund set up to invest in new high-tech start- ups. The funds involve a great deal of risk, however, due to the nature of their investments.
High-tech firms have developed rapidly over the past decade and are now competing neck and neck with traditional firms. Some people have therefore expanded the definition of venture capital investments to include investments in any unlisted start-up company regardless of their tech level.
Investment in these traditional firms should be called "direct investment" or "investment in unlisted companies," in order to emphasize that the investment is not conducted indirectly through the stock market.
The role of venture capital firms is to make efficient use of idle private capital to develop small enterprises. Venture capital funds can be likened to an "accelerator," in that their role is to select promising firms, rapidly develop them, get them market-listed, and then search for new firms to develop.
The funds are an effective method of bringing together venture capital, high technology, and human capital and result in the creation of many highly competitive tech firms.
Most venture capital companies invest in unlisted, high-tech companies with large growth potential. Moreover, the goal of venture capital funds' investments is not to retain stock in the companies or collect stock dividends, but instead to realize large gains by first infusing large amounts of capital and expertise to induce rapid growth in the companies, and then selling their stake in the firms.
It seems the legislators in question hope to make high-risk investments through venture capital funds using both official and unofficial channels. The official channels refer to investments in the OTC's "second board" due to open in June, which will allow investment in high-tech firms based on traditional investment and management practices. This would serve as to "accelerate" the growth of high-tech firms in Taiwan.
The unofficial method refers to venture capital firms that dangle a small amount of capital in front of legislators, who then help the firms by pressuring banks, and finally the public at large to invest in the firms. The high risk of the investments, however, could in effect mortgage society and government against the investments.
Capital could be invested preferentially into legislator-controlled, unlisted companies, and if any problems emerge, the firms could be dumped onto their major shareholders: the state-owned banks, government and society. It could be the start of another monster the likes of the Hungyuan Investment Company (
OTC's "second board" has yet to be established, meaning there is still a legal gray area regarding venture capital firms. Further, risk hedging mechanisms have yet to be set up, and laws and regulations have still not been passed.
Moreover, it is an election year, and various forces are doing their best to ramp up investment in companies under their control. Their strategy may lead to mammoth profits if they are able to get their companies rolling before the opening of the "second board," and then take advantage of the lax qualifications for listing.
It usually takes a venture capital company six to seven years to select a unlisted high-tech firm, invest in it and get it listed.
With the frenetic speculation on the TAIEX, exploding "land-mine stocks" and legislators in need of huge election war chests every three years, this writer is pessimistic about venture capital firms controlled by legislators.
But we shouldn't make a negative judgement against all venture capital firms. Rather, we should focus our concern on whether government regulations for the industry are complete and fully implemented, and whether the public is informed about the nature of these firms. In a market economy, investors must bear a portion of responsibility for their investment decisions.
Chiu Chen-miao is a doctoral student at the at Sun Yat-sen Graduate Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities at National Chengchi University.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry