The word "genocide" was coined in a 1944 book by Raphael Lemkin called "Axis Rule in Occupied Europe" in which he wrote:
"Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves."
Four years later, in 1948, the UN passed the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
Under the above conditions, the Japanese colonial system, then the KMT's policies, led in large part to the "integration of ... the past five decades," (Editorial, January 10, pg. 8) as you term it. So your editorial which "argues" against "nativeness" and mandatory language training classes is an acceptance of this infamy.
Colonization has resulted in a serious loss of cultural diversity.
Let us consider the following. According to a 1996 Ethnologue report, [www.sil.org/ethnologue/countries/Taiw.html] of the 28 languages listed for Taiwan, 13 are extinct or nearly extinct -- all Aboriginal languages. Several, if not all, of the remaining indigenous languages are endangered due to the low number of young people speaking them.
Legal protection in the form of mandatory mother language teaching is one element that may help balance the onslaught of the dominant settler culture against Taiwan's Aboriginal peoples. Other essential measures include large scale restoration of lands, and compensation for past repression.
Languages are not merely a "tool for communication" but are an essential part of any culture. Your preaching of "free market principles" is Neo-liberal fundamentalism which seeks to commodify everything. It also accepts the tyrannical legacy of the Japanese and the KMT, which caused so much devastation to Taiwan's Aboriginal cultures.
There will be difficulties in implementing multi-lingual education but the alternative is what Vandana Shiva, a noted Indian human rights activist, has termed a "monoculture of the mind."
Mark Munsterhjelm
Taipei
The old way is the best
I enjoyed reading your editorial "Romanization must strike a balance" (Page 8, Jan. 9) and have a few comments.
What's most interesting to me is the statement that "the Wade-Giles system should be rescinded from the list of potential systems for future deliberations" because "a total of 136 syllables require additional phonetic signs or diacritic marks, making it a fairly cumbersome system for printing and typing."
This is interesting because if there is any logic and consistency in these people's thinking, this same argument should have led them to eliminate all the other three systems, ie Mandarin Phonetic Symbols II (1986), China Hanyu Pinyin and Taiwan Tongyong Pinyin, because a total of some 400 or so syllables still require additional phonetic signs or diacritic marks to accurately represent the Chinese phonemic system.
The differences between Wade-Giles, Mandarin Phonetic Symbols II (1986), Hanyu Pinyin and Tongyong Pinyin, especially those between the latter three, are really trivial. They share the same underlying design principle that tones are optional add-on features.
Fundamentally different from this design principle is Gwoyeu Romatzyh, also known as Mandarin Phonetic Symbols II (1928), which treats tones as phonemic and an inalienable component of the Chinese syllable, resulting in the capability of representing the entire Chinese phonemic system without resorting to the use of any diacritic marks.
The design of Gwoyeu Romatzyh proved its value through the practice of Chinese Braille. The person who designed the mainland version of Braille in 1952 -- which treats tones as optional add-on features -- realized the system's many defects after it had been put to use for nearly half a century, and designed a new system in which tones are an integral part of the syllable form. This new system was enacted by the PRC government in 1996.
Political and pragmatic considerations aside, Gwoyeu Romatzyh is the best Chinese romanization system anyone can hope for, from both a theoretical and a practical point of view.
If the ROC government really wants to have a unique romanization system, it should go back to the system it used from 1928 to 1986. With proper promotion it will become more popular and might even replace Hanyu Pinyin one day.
Otherwise, if the ROC government really doesn't understand the value of Gwoyeu Romatzyh and really believes that it is too difficult for anyone with an average IQ to grasp, or if it really believes it's futile to fight against the popularity of Hanyu Pinyin, then it might as well adopt the Hanyu Pinyin system as is and forget about the rest.
The idea that such an action is tantamount to admitting ROC is part of PRC is truly stupid and hysteric. Anyone who believes in this should calm down and take a good look at Singapore.
In short, if the ROC government is smart, then it should reinstate and promote Gwoyeu Romatzyh; otherwise, it should adopt Hanyu Pinyin in its entirety. Any other attempt is bound to fail.
Benjamin Ao, Ph.D.
USA
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry