Most of the Chinese government agents handling Taiwan affairs, especially the ones working for Taiwan Affairs Offices under the State Council (
The Taiwanese, who have no understanding about anti-espionage, are not qualified to be the rivals of these Chinese spies. Therefore, the Chinese call the Taiwanese Dai-bao (呆胞, stupid Taiwanese), a derogatory derivative of Tai-bao (台胞, Taiwanese brethren).
Apart from their professional training in united front work, the Chinese officials on Taiwan affairs are also well-informed about current affairs in Taiwan. Hence they are good at manipulating the contradictions among the Taiwanese business groups operating in China.
Since I ran across intelligence agents in Beijing ten years ago, I have learned how to defend myself against their propaganda wars. Last week, James Soong (
The next day, however, I was surprised to see another cable program conduct an interview with the same Chinese scholar again. His remarks were full of "united front work" cliches, and he even told the audience who they should vote for in Taiwan's presidential election in March.
All of his comments were hardly acceptable for Taiwanese. Is the diversity in our society such that we can tolerate such statements being broadcast on TV? Perhaps the Chinese no longer need their Ministry of State Security since some Taiwan TV channels are already acting as their mouthpieces! The People's Liberation Army does not even have to cross the Taiwan Strait; they can beat us even while staying in their own ball park!
Though there has been a lot of interaction between the two sides of the strait, the Chinese authorities still regard Taiwan as a key power struggle and they will never give up any opportunity to struggle against Taiwan. (This is what I heard from a high-ranking Chinese official.)
Soong has deviated from public opinion by being a lackey of the Beijing authorities. This is his own choice.
However, Taiwanese media should be aware of conspiracies and should avoid falling into the trap of being China's megaphone or hired thug. Voters and audiences should say "no" to those politicians or media who have no sense of social responsibility.
Rick Chu is Associate Editor in Chief of the Taipei Times
Having returned to the UK late last year and with a Taiwanese spouse remaining in Taiwan, I have been afforded the chance to compare and contrast the UK and Taiwanese governments’ responses to the COVID-19 crisis. My early conclusions are that Taiwan benefits from a rational, competent government, which quickly recognizes, adapts to and confronts large-scale disasters. It is led by a government that does more than just talk of respecting democracy and human rights, one that is scrutinized and responds to criticism, one that is concerned about public opinion, and one that is used to dealing with emergencies on
The “Wuhan pneumonia” outbreak has become a pandemic, but many countries have yet to come to grips with the worsening severity of this medical crisis. Historian Robert Peckham has studied how the ecology of deadly diseases has changed from the late 19th century until today and, in his 2016 book titled Epidemics in Modern Asia highlights the intrinsic link between global connectivity and emerging infections. The frequency of outbreaks — from SARS in 2003 to swine flu in 2009 and today’s COVID-19 — and their rapid rate of transmission owe much to globalization. Better and cheaper transportation and communications technology have empowered
Early last month, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣) was elected party chairman, winning with a seven-to-three majority over pro-Beijing former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), a two-time KMT vice chairman. Chiang’s victory has been interpreted as a generational change and the beginning of major party reform. In his inauguration speech on March 9, Chiang did not mention the so-called “1992 consensus.” Analysts believe that his most urgent task is to attract more young people to the party and win voter trust, and that he does not care about Beijing’s reaction. After joining the party chairmanship by-election, Chiang made his