When I am facing patients with mental disorders, I often use a psychotherapy method known as dynamic orientated psycho-analytical therapy to deal with a patient's internal psychological conflicts and to lead the patient to think about the root of his or her problems.
When patients are facing problems and cannot reply clearly to my questions or try to be ambiguous, I pull them back to reality and hope to help them face their own difficulties.
I always try to show my support and acceptance of the patients, to make them realize the crux of the problems. Hopefully they will develop their own capabilities to solve problems.
However, for a long time I couldn't do that myself when it came to political issues.
I remember when in 1975, while I was a senior in high school, I saw on TV a news report about the death of Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石). For some reason, I started to cry inside my heart. The education I had had at that time told me that he was a great national hero.
It wasn't until many years later, when I happened to read Peng Ming-min's (
I just relied on the dull and boring propaganda-type of education I had received. I felt like I had my own personal Kaohsiung Incident: I could only wonder why Taiwan had mobsters, why they wanted to ruin and destroy our peaceful and stable society?
After 20 years, as I look back and read about the biased reporting by the media at that time and the verdicts from the courts, I said to myself why do I feel so differently? I was between tears and laughter, totally embarrassed.
When I see kids fight, I try to let them know that we adults know it is not comfortable to be beaten, and I also show them that it is not right to beat other people up. I teach them how to deal with conflicts. I ask them to think that besides hitting back, are there other good ways to solve the problems?
Returning to politics, I have been thinking a lot about the James Soong (
Whether Soong actually embezzled money or not seems like a trivial thing to me.
What I do care about is whether our government is efficiently using the financial resources it has to serve the public -- and not using the money as a tool for maintaining its power or as bargaining chips for political deals.
After Soong's recent news conferences, I asked myself: "Am I being an idiot? Why is it that I don't understand what's going on? I am not sure where the money came from. I only care about whether Soong explains his stance towards the way the money is used in the system. Maybe this is part of a private agreement that Soong does not want anybody else to know about. But it is also hurting people who care about the country's politics."
I hope my children understand when I tell them that it is wrong to hit other people and not to justify their behavior by saying "other people hit, too."
I see the same thing in money politics. Can Soong say that I am not wrong because everybody else is engaged in money politics?
I have been watching the evolution of Taiwan's democracy and trying to learn from it. Sometimes I am happy and sometimes I am worried.
I am happy that our progress in democratic development is shown to the public through open and fair reports in the media, and that through the Soong scandal, the public may see into the workings of party politics.
At the same time, I wonder if people will learn to reflect upon and judge the lessons they have learned and go on with their lives and not be hampered by the sensational political advertisements.
Thinking back at my tears over Chiang Kai-shek's death, I do not feel funny. I was just an innocent, naive child at the time. Now I have grown up. I have my own values and perspectives with which I can evaluate political issues such as who to vote for as president.
I hope that when I show parents how to deal with their children's behavioral problems, I can also give myself a sense of mission: to teach children how to think critically and of good ways to solve problems -- and to care about and pay attention to the society around them.
Tang King-su is a psychiatrist at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Kaohsiung.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.