James Soong's (
Compare it to the policies of his rivals. Lien Chan (
Soong's formula looks different, however. Both of his rivals stress Taiwan's statehood as a given -- whether you call it the Republic of China or not. Lee's use of "special" was not intended to downgrade this relationship to something less than that between two sovereign states. It was to acknowledge that the cross-strait relationship is culturally, historically and linguistically closer than that of, say, Taiwan and the Philippines. China is another country but it is not an entirely foreign country.
Soong's use of "quasi" (
So is Soong advocating "one country, two systems" for Taiwan? Almost certainly, he would protest at this suggestion. But his position on Taiwan's status leads naturally in this direction. "Quasi" means less than full, less than complete. Why should Taiwan, a sovereign state, have anything less than complete international relations with another sovereign state? Only if you do not recognize the sovereignty of one side or another. Assuming Soong is not Quixotic enough to try to argue the old KMT line that the mainland is a renegade part of the ROC, then what he is getting at must be that Taiwan is less than sovereign.
If this is the basis on which Soong thinks that Taiwan can enter into negotiations with China, then we should all be glad that the current financial scandal surrounding him might make jail, rather than the Presidential Office, his next home. Both the Chinese communists and the US State Department have been eager to find anyone in Taiwan politics who is ready to sacrifice Taiwan's sovereignty in return for China not pointing its missiles across the Strait. Soong's talk of a "mutual non-aggression treaty" smacks too much of the idea of US foreign policy mavens such as Stanley Roth at the State Department and Kenneth Lieberthal, senior director for Asian affairs at the National Security Council, and their pernicious idea of "interim agreements."
Should, God forbid, Soong be elected, we are cur-ious as to whether he will call himself a quasi-president. Perhaps he prefers the sound of "Chief Executive" like Hong Kong's Tung Chee-hwa.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with