A few years ago, when I was in northeast China to attend an academic symposium, a Chinese scholar told me that China had two research institutes on international issues. One is the "China Institute of International Studies" (
(
The scholar also revealed that the one with "contemporary" in its name had a relatively poor professional level because it was not just engaged in academic research: it also had national security responsibilities.
It is common knowledge that the Ministry of State Security is China's highest intelligence agency, administering "united front work" and "intelligence gathering" missions. Therefore, researchers from the Institute of Contemporary International Relations seldom appear at international academic symposiums. Even if they do attend, their professional level is seldom recognized by academics around the world, who know the institute's background only too well.
In this light, we can find quite a few strange things about James Soong's (
One, why was Soong appearing on CNN with someone from China who is not his equal? Two, given Soong's expertise in media maneuvers and manipulation, he simply could not have overlooked who he would be talking to. Three, given his ample experience in office, he could not have been ignorant of the institute's relationship with China's Ministry of State Security. Four, how could Yen have possibly appeared on CNN with Soong if his appearance had not been approved by that same ministry?
Any expert will know at first sight that Soong was trying to export himself to CNN for processing and re-import back into Taiwan.
However, the above list of strange things make us suspect that this was a pre-arranged, rehearsed, mutually acceptable "dialogue show" that both Soong and the Chinese authorities are happy with. The question now is: what is the nature of Soong's relationship with China's Ministry of State Security?
We are waiting for him to come clean.
Rick Chu is associate editor in chief of the Taipei Times.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations