Yesterday, after the electricity in my house was restored, the first thing we did was turn on the television to see the earthquake coverage. After switching around all of the local news networks, it occurred to me to take a look at CNN's coverage. After all, that is what my relatives and friends overseas would likely be viewing.
After the opening sequence for the noon bulletin, a "Special Report" headline appeared, and CNN went to its anchor, Michael Holmes, in Atlanta.
Imagine my surprise when the first four words out of Holmes' mouth were "China's president Jiang Zemin (
But before I could wonder any further, he completed his sentence: Jiang had expressed his concern about the quake! That was how they began their story. Not with Taiwan, even to let the viewers know the basic facts. That came later. The first word was China in a sentence written in a way to mislead outsiders into thinking that Taiwan was part of China. Even at a time of disaster, they couldn't pass up any opportunity to put Taiwan down.
But perhaps CNN was just legitimately highlighting international reaction? Unfortunately, that thesis doesn't hold up, since Bill Clinton's public condolences and the news about the rescue teams coming from the US and Japan were not mentioned once during the entire story. It is extremely difficult to see how the perpetually America-centric CNN missed the Clinton angle, yet managed to put Jiang in the opening sentence.
After buttering up Beijing, the CNN team went on to do the actual story. Here, too, their performance left much to be desired. The team parachuted in from Hong Kong was led by the usually capable Mike Chinoy, who apparently had just arrived ; however, it was very disappointing that they went straight to Taipei, instead to where most of the damage occurred. Arriving at CKS airport, it would have taken him not a minute longer in his car to head south to Taichung rather than north to Taipei.
This was a surely honest but still quite serious mistake. Apparently they were not aware of where the damage was concentrated, despite continuous broadcasting of that information from 2am. And of course, there is the old "Taiwan is just Taipei" mentality, not of course, confined to CNN.
This error was then compounded by poor reporting, which almost exclusively focused on the relatively few disasters in Taipei. Almost comically, they even replayed in full Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
It was not comical that the bulk of the disaster-struck areas were referred to as remote, whose "difficult communications" conveniently covered CNN's ignorance. Of course, some of the worst of the tragedy did occur in isolated interior locales, but the cities of Taichung, Nantou and Chiayi are not exactly primitive, as CNN should have known.
Other errors included the hasty conclusion (obviously inspired by the Turkey quake) in which older buildings were deemed more likely to collapse, despite the fact that most locals had the opposite impression.
At 2pm, CNN broadcast a much different story, deleting the Jiang reference and including an interview with a local journalist. But it retained the misplaced emphasis on Taipei, and added the comment that it was "too early to say" whether there was a "organized response," ten hours after it had commenced.
I realize that CNN, like many other news agencies, tries to operate without maintaining a correspondent in Taiwan. But at least the staff in HK could bother to do a little homework and brief their reporters. And, at the very least, they could refrain from conniving with China in that country's united front campaign.
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.