Of the policies proposed by the four presidential candidates so far, James Soong's (宋楚瑜) China policy is perhaps the one Beijing likes the best. In Soong's talk on "Taiwan's big future," he announced his China policy in detail, but yet with care and reservation. Later on, he also mentioned his policy on some occasions, both inside and outside the country. In his interview with the Washington Post, he gave more specific details, which reveal a clearer picture of Soong's pro-Beijing China policy.
Following reports appearing in the Japanese media that Soong is China's favorite, the Washington Post once again reported that "many of China's reformers hope that Soong will win the presidential election." Of course, what they mean by "China's reformers" has yet to be determined, but the foreign media in Beijing understand that there is evidence indicating that Beijing prefers Soong over the other candidates and that Soong's China policy fits well with Beijing's policy.
Soong believes that Taiwan's greatest challenge will lie in the economic realm. Therefore, in order to become an Asia Pacific Regional Operations Center, Taiwan must jettison the semi-ban on big ticket investments that constitutes the "no haste, be patient" policy (戒急用忍) and open the "three links" (三通).
Actually, "security" is Taiwan's greatest challenge, with China being the one and only threat. Economically, although Taiwan has not yet opened direct links, it has already been regarded as one of the world's more formidable trade partners; if domestic control allows greater flexibility, the establishment of the Asia Pacific Operation Center will also help ease domestic restrictions. At present, China stills remains at a high risk, highly unstable point in its development of finance and trade; the losses and failures of the Singapore government's Suzhou investments provide a grim warning to "China market" optimists.
Direct links would encourage further investment in China, which could create serious problems with capital outflow from Taiwan and a rise in the unemployment rate. Politically speaking, China does not recognize the existence of Taiwan, yet economically it constantly urges Taiwan to abandon the concept of "no haste, be patient" and liberalize direct links. Of course there is no mystery as to why they do this. But from Taiwan's point of view, its leader has to consider what course of action would best benefit the whole country.
Soong's plan to put pragmatic diplomacy on the back burner, his unwillingness to struggle against China diplomatically, is in fact the same as the "Hong Kong-ization" of Taiwan. This amounts to the acceptance of China's "one country, two systems." Where there is sovereignty, there is diplomacy; likewise where there is diplomacy, there must be sovereignty as well. The basic difference between Taiwan and Hong Kong is that Taiwan has sovereignty, and does not require Beijing's instructions before making major decisions. Soong's unwillingness to struggle against China diplomatically is tantamount to giving up the sovereignty of the Republic of China and embracing "one country, two systems."
This is not a matter that can be cleared up simply by Soong's announcement that he rejects the formula of "one country, two systems." Before we have reached an agreement on mutual recognition -- like that between North and South Korea -- abandoning diplomatic effort is just the same as giving up our sovereignty. China shuts out Taiwan's diplomatic activities; therefore, if we don't struggle against China diplomatically, there will be absolutely no room for diplomacy. Soong, who himself holds a degree in diplomacy, should be clear about this.
RSS