After the US House of Representatives defied US President George W. Bush by removing restrictions on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research, the divisive debate now moves to the Senate, where some members of Bush's Republican party strongly advocate passing the bill.
The issue has split the majority Republicans, and many members of Bush's party feel that the potential benefits of research using leftover frozen fertilized eggs outweigh the concerns of those who say the embryos represent human life and should not be destroyed for research.
An estimated 400,000 frozen embryos are currently stored in the US.
Bush, who in 2001 limited federal funding for embryonic stem cell research to fewer than two dozen stem cell lines, said last week he would veto any such legislation.
He renewed his threat before tomorrow's House vote at a White House gathering that included adopted children born from leftover fertilized embryos.
"Crossing this line would be a great mistake," said Bush, who has not vetoed any legislation from the Republican-controlled Congress during his presidency.
The president's position is in line with many "pro-life" groups, such as anti-abortion and religious organizations who form a backbone of his constituency. But despite threats of political retribution against Republicans who support embryonic stem cell research, the influence of such groups has not had the impact in this case.
Senator Orrin Hatch, a staunchly pro-life Republican, strongly favors embryonic stem cell research. He said that he believes that embryonic stem cell research "supports life."
"I think being pro-life means helping the living as well as the unborn," Hatch said. "To allow those 400,000 fertilized eggs to be discarded, and thus to die, flies in the face of the pro-life consideration."
"To not utilize those for the benefit of mankind and to just let them die or crystallize in place is just stupid, as far as I'm concerned," he said.
Bush's veto threat "makes it more difficult" to pass the bill, Hatch said, but he said he was confident there are enough votes in the Senate to get it through. There are 55 Republicans in the 100-member Senate.
But Hatch's strong support for embryonic stem cell research, and that of a handful of other Republican senators, is not the only sign that the issue divides the party.
Fifty Republicans supported the embryonic stem cell bill in the House of Representatives. The passage of the legislation, by a 238-194 vote, was a rare loss for Bush and Republican leaders, who maintain strong party discipline in the chamber.
However, the margin is not enough to overcome a presidential veto.
Republican Senator Arlen Specter on Wednesday said that he believes "that margin could grow to override a veto." Specter also thinks that the Senate could overcome a presidential veto.
Conservative Republican Senator Trent Lott said that while he generally agrees with Bush, he believes there is "great potential in this stem cell area and we ought to see if we can find ways for health reasons" to do research.
Lott said the issue is "very dicey" and that medical and ethical concerns must be considered. He strongly opposed the "harvesting" of stem cells but said the issue gets fuzzier when it comes to existing eggs that would otherwise be discarded, which is the focus of the legislation.
"You want to do all you can to help research that will save life, but you don't want to start producing life that will be destroyed for health research," Lott said.
Another indication that Republicans are not united is the stance by one of their Republican heroes, former first lady Nancy Reagan, whose late husband, former president Ronald Reagan, suffered from Alzheimer's -- one of the diseases that scientists believe could be helped through stem cell therapy.
Alzheimer's is a growing plague for millions of seniors in a rapidly aging population.
She is an outspoken supporter of embryonic stem cell research.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under