Your editorial ("China's inflexibility blocks progress," Oct. 15, page 8) correctly points out that Beijing's insistence on the "one China" principle before cross-strait talks and Taipei's unwillingness to do so make it impossible for the two sides to resume semi-official talks in the near future.
However, your editorial failed to recognize the dilemma Beijing faces. If it accepts President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) proposal, it would mean that Beijing agrees with Chen's "the Republic of China is Taiwan, and Taiwan is the Republic of China" statement. (Which, by the way, is tantamount to a revision of the Republic of China's Constitution.)
From Beijing's perspective, Chen's speech was aimed at pleasing the US and garnering votes at the year-end legislative elections.
If Beijing agrees to talk now, it will give political points to Chen and his party, which Beijing is absolutely unwilling to do. But if Beijing rejects Chen's proposal as it has, Taiwan and probably the US will blame Beijing for the continued stalemate of cross-strait relations. Neither choice is in Beijing's favor.
Beijing had hoped to wait out Chen, but the strategy has backfired. Even without him, Taiwanese identity is growing rapidly. So China may have to face reality and talk to an increasingly assertive Taiwan. But resolving the cross-strait dispute will require patience, wisdom and sincerity from both sides.
Just as Beijing cannot force Taiwan to accept the "one China" principle now, Taiwan simply cannot force upon China the claim that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent country, or there is one country on each side of the Taiwan Strait, before cross-strait negotiations.
Only when both sides become flexible can serious cross-strait talks be resumed.
Zhu Zhiqun
Bridgeport, Connecticut
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with