Most journalistic accounts of the new forms of electronic money misleadingly spin the story as the emergence of yet another convenience for the technologically pampered. So what if we can pull out a "smart card" rather than carry coins? Big deal. These new forms of money sound like power windows on cars, or remote control for TV sets. Maybe we'd be better off without these gadgets.
But media coverage has failed to look far enough into the future, and to comprehend the full extent of the changes that will be wrought by new forms of electronic money, as people and businesses invent new ways of doing business. Electronic money is not a channel changer: As it develops, it will help transform the world economy.
Two benefits of electronic money stand out, and will likely contribute to its growth. Most important, it will have profound intellectual benefits by creating incentives for the active pursuit of ideas. Second, electronic money will advance globalization, expanding the scope and versatility of the Internet and making it easier for people to interact constructively with others around the world. Taken together, these two benefits will enable millions of minds to work together far more effectively than ever before.
To understand electronic money's potential significance, consider the invention of coins, the first form of true money, in Lydia (now Turkey) in the 7th century BC and, independently, in China. This was an important advance, and thus one that spread quickly.
The reason is straightforward. Before the invention of coins, commerce depended on precious metals. But the amounts had to be cut to the size of the transaction and weighed out with balance scales. People had to carry the scales, accompanying weights, and sometimes even tools to cut the metal, just to be able to transact. Archeologists still find elaborate (and probably expensive in those days) two-pan balance scales and weights on sunken bronze-age merchant ships. Most people didn't have them.
Another difficulty with using undifferentiated precious metals for exchange was that some trust or expertise was required to assure people that the metal was pure. The same problem occurred with other commodities that people tried to use for exchange, such as gems or shells; their value was too uncertain.
As a result of these obstacles, it was hard to carry out small transactions before the invention of standardized and identical coins, and trade must have been largely confined to big deals between major parties. With the introduction of coins, it became possible to develop many new kinds of business. One could easily establish and operate a business selling food by the serving or providing small household items to anyone who happened to pass by.
But, most importantly, the invention of coins greatly enhanced the spread of knowledge. After the invention of coins, it became easy to sell books, lessons and instructions. The development of coins is part of the reason that both the classical world around ancient Lydia and China in the Han Dynasty were so advanced compared to other parts of the world.
The lesson is that the magnitude of transaction costs and contracting costs ultimately determine much of an economy's structure. As new forms of money reduce these costs, the richness and complexity of our economy will be increased. Lower transaction costs mean that exchange can be dramatically more fine-grained. With the latest forms of electronic money we can sell millions of little things, to millions of different people all over the world. Nowhere is this more important than in the realm of ideas.
Credit-card companies now routinely charge the firms accepting credit card payments US$0.25, plus between 2 percent and 3 percent of the amount transferred per payment. This fee structure makes it difficult to run a business selling items for less than US$10, and impossible to run a business selling items for less than US$1: Transaction costs eat up the profits.
Through superior payments software, micropayments companies like Paypal (founded in 1998), Yaga (founded in 2000), Peppercoin (founded in 2001) and BitPass (founded in 2002) are able to offer much lower transaction costs than credit-card companies, greatly expanding the number of transactions. A company can now charge people less than US$1 for a service (such as viewing a Web page), and get significant returns by high volume.
There are skeptics who say that the public is resistant to buying digital content, because people are accustomed to getting it for free. That is what people used to say years ago about cable TV. Excellent TV programming is not given away for free. Neither are other substantial intellectual creations. These skeptics overlook the profound changes that new technologies gradually make in our habits as we discover their possibilities.
Already, we have seen the success of Apple's iTunes, which sells music for US$0.99 per song. Created last year, the iTunes Music Store recently surpassed its 100 millionth sale. That is certainly high volume. What iTunes sells is one form of intellectual content. Other forms will follow.
It will be exciting to see what new forms of intellectual content are invented in coming years and decades. The economic revolution -- both online and offline -- that will be triggered as we learn how to use electronic money may be as profound as that wrought by our ancient ancestors' invention of coins.
Robert Shiller is professor of economics at Yale University, and author of Irrational Exuberance and The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st Century.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and