On Sept. 11 a sudden and violent aerial attack on a symbolic building left many dead and the country in a state of fear and panic.
But this was Sept. 11, 1973, the year of the coup in Chile which led to 17 years of military dictatorship, the violent death of nearly 4,000 people, the torturing of an estimated 50,000, and the imprisonment and exile of hundreds of thousands.
On the eve of the 30th anniversary, Chile is engaged in a new debate on how to resolve the human consequences of the coup. Earlier this month President Ricardo Lagos, the Socialist party leader who was elected as part of a center-left coalition, unveiled a new set of proposals, called "There is no tomorrow without a yesterday", for resolving what happened, and what should be done for the victims and to the perpetrators.
The coup overthrew the Socialist president, Salvador Allende, who is generally believed to have killed himself after the military attacked La Moneda, the seat of government. In the wake of the coup, opponents of the junta were herded into in the national stadium in Santiago and thousands in the country were jailed.
The coup had the tacit blessing and cooperation of the US, whose secretary of state, Henry Kissinger, famously said that Chile could not be allowed to "go Marxist" just because "its people are irresponsible." General Augusto Pinochet ruled for 17 years before losing a plebiscite vote in 1988, which led to the return of democracy the following year.
General Pinochet was detained in England in 1998 on an arrest warrant issued by the Spanish judge Baltasar Garzon, in connection with crimes committed by the military against Spanish citizens. Medical experts in Britain decided that the general, now 87, was mentally too feeble to stand trial and he was returned to Chile, where, in 2001, the courts reached the same conclusion.
President Lagos' proposals include an amnesty to low-ranking members of the military who supply information on the atrocities and where bodies may be found, compensation packages for the relatives of the dead and torture survivors, which include pensions and health care, and a truth commission on torture.
President Lagos, who was himself detained during the Pinochet years, has said the measures are as far as he can reasonably go while maintaining the support of the armed forces. The new commander in chief, Juan Emilio Cheyre, the second to take office since General Pinochet's rule, has pledged the armed forces to a nunca mas (never again) approach to the atrocities, but says most service people have yet to be fully convinced of the necessity of the process of reconciliation.
Relatives of those who "disappeared" have been expressing their concern about the measures and voicing their dismay that many people may now escape punishment by acting as informers.
"The measure [of immunity] is a significant signal to the military," said Mireya Garcia, of the Group of Relatives of the Disappeared. "The reduced sentences are so broad and extensive that anyone who has information could request the benefits. It is a veiled form of impunity."
The man who has been advising Lagos on the new proposals is Jose Zalaquett, a former deputy general secretary of Amnesty International. He was 30, a lawyer and university lecturer at the time of the coup, having also worked for the Allende government. He worked with the Peace Committee, the body that tried to intervene on behalf of the jailed and disappeared, was jailed, and then exiled for 10 years.
"The very fact of the bombing of La Moneda was incredible," he said last week. "For people abroad, it is hard to evoke the equivalent -- like bombing the White House or Buckingham Palace. They notified the whole country in a brutal way that they meant business and they would not stop at anything. But even then we thought democracy would be restored in a few years. No one would have guessed 17 years." Zalaquett is critical now of some aspects of the Allende government. "I was looking at this footage from 30 years ago and I thought `Were we that crazy?' We thought the road to socialism was inevitable. We had this naive belief that, because the winds of history were blowing in our direction, somehow we would be taken to a safe harbor.
"A mixture of the spirit of the 60s, a thirst for justice, well-intentioned irresponsibility and naivete, and you get what we were. Honestly speaking, we have very mixed views about Allende. We respect his self-immolation and his heroism, he was very well-meant but a terrible administrator. We knew the government was doomed and it was just a question of time."
Of the current attempts to bring to account the perpetrators of the torture and disappearances, he said: "It is a like an icebreaking ship ... without Pinochet being detained in London, it is hard to believe that you would have had so soon the recognition and acknowledgement of a new generation of military people and even the most hardcore rightwing acknowledging some of their responsibilities ... I think Pinochet is a liar on the one hand and involved up to his neck on the other, but he is out of the picture now because he is not fit to stand trial. He is not unblemished. As far as history is concerned, his car has been `keyed'."
Elizabeth Lira, who teaches at the center of ethics at the University of Alberto Hurtado in Santiago, said that if the coup had not happened Allende would probably have lost the next election to the Christian Democrats. "But we were part of the cold war, and therefore the problems of Chile were amplified into a great conspiracy: the dictatorship justified the coup on the grounds that Chile would be like Cuba."
Opening up what happened to public debate had been a healthy experience."Before, the problem of the disappeared or tortured was a private problem. Now it is a problem of society -- of the military, the judiciary, the state. That is a great change."
What everyone is waiting to see is what actually happens to those accused. So far 40 people have been convicted and sentenced. They include Manuel Contreras, who headed the notorious secret police, the Dina. A further 300 cases are at various stages. Because of the passage of time, most of the sentences of those convicted will be no more than a few years.
The prosecutions are further complicated by a controversial amnesty law, covering the period 1974 to 1978, when most of the atrocities took place, which was introduced under General Pinochet in 1980. But many of those who disappeared have never been found, so under a legal technicality their abduction is still current and those who seized them are not covered by the amnesty.
There is no shortage of cases to investigate. The official figure for the dead or disappeared is 3,150 although there are about 500 or 600 other cases which are classified as `fallen'. Zalaquett estimates that between 150,000 and 200,000 people spent time in jail for political reasons, although most of them were held for only days or weeks.
He also estimates that between 40,000 and 50,000 suffered "ill treatment," ranging from roughing up to sophisticated forms of electrical and psychological torture.
Among those who have been asked to give evidence is Henry Kissinger. He has so far declined, and now travels abroad only after receiving legal advice, for fear of arrest.
Behind La Moneda there is a statue which shows Allende wrapped in the Chilean flag above his words: "I have faith in Chile and its destiny." It attracts admirers of the late president from Chile and abroad.
Today Chile faces different problems: a minimum wage of US$165 a month, high unemployment and growing labor unrest, which led to the country's first general strike for 17 years on Aug. 13.
But for many the coup and its aftermath still cast a long and enduring shadow over the country, which must be removed before the country can move on.
Pamela Pereira, a Socialist party deputy whose father was one of the victims of General Pinochet, said of Allende and his successor: "Where are these two figures now? One is immortalized by a statue by La Moneda, the other has to pretend to be mad. History has put them in their proper place."
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with