On March 17, former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung (林義雄) and members of the Nuclear 4 Referendum Initiative Association held a sit-down protest in front of the Executive Yuan. They demanded that the government hold a referendum on the fate of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in next year's presidential election. Lin's protest has once again brought the anti-nuclear issue into the spotlight.
In Britain, the issue of nuclear energy is no longer political but economic, rarely evoking agitation in society or political confrontation. Large-scale, anti-nuclear protests are now rarely organized because keeping the environment nuclear-free has become a consensus among the people. Vote-minded politicians also refrain from mentioning the construction of nuclear power plants because they want to bury the issue. The trend is similar in other European countries. Take Germany's recent election for example. The Green Party owed its remarkable success to the party's anti-nuclear and environmental-protection positions. The anti-nuclear movement has clearly become a trend worldwide.
After she came to power in the 1980s, then British prime minister Margaret Thatcher vigorously promoted the privatization of state-owned industries. The position of our ruling party's policy is the same: "The government will give the work to the people if they can do it." These days, Britain suffers disastrous consequences in some areas of privatization. British Energy is a vivid example. After privatization, the company was on the verge of bankruptcy due to the inappropriate handling of energy problems. Its stock price fell to rock bottom.
Many of the shares were annuity-based investments for the privatization of British Energy. Because energy problems affect the people's livelihood, the British parliament allocated large budgets each year to subsidize such privatized industries. Due to the disposal problems of nuclear waste materials, the British government, on Sept. 26 last year, urgently provided ?50 million (NT$2.72 billion) and the act led to a heated debate in the parliament.
The safety of nuclear energy was no longer the subject of debate. Rather, how much more tax money will the government spend to subsidize British Energy for handling nuclear waste materials? How will they handle the many nuclear power plants that will soon be decommissioned? How will they handle the large tract of nuclear-contaminated land that will be unlivable for hundreds of years?
Although Britain has more than 50 countries in its commonwealth, the British people generally have a golden-rule understanding. They dare not recklessly dump nuclear waste materials in another country. Should the British government implement a policy of dumping nuclear waste materials while Europe is getting more nuclear-conscious, it will be difficult for the ships carrying nuclear waste materials to escape the human shields of Greenpeace. Obviously, nuclear energy is no longer an inexpensive option.
Lin has always taken the road that few people tread, hoping to open up a pure land for the Taiwanese. I cannot help but admire Lin, who led the masses under the hot sun to advocate for a nuclear-free homeland. From authoritarianism to democracy, Taiwan has repeatedly followed in the footsteps of advanced countries. Some of the policies such as universal healthcare, pre-school education and stipends for seniors are mostly modeled after Britain. In light of the issue of nuclear energy in Britain, our government officials should take the long-term interest of the Taiwanese people as a starting point and should leave a nuclear-free homeland for future generations and it cannot bear possible consequences of nuclear accidents or alarm.
Yen Shang-yung is an assistant professor at Feng Chia University.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry