Mon, Oct 22, 2007 News Editorials 586610861 visits
 Photo News
 More Business Focus
 More IELTS
 Johnny Neihu
 
 Community Compass
 
  • Back Issue

  •   << >>   Full List

  • TaipeiTimes
  •   Subscribe
  •   Advertise
  •   Employment
  •   FAQ
  •   About Us
  •   Contact Us
  •   Copyright
  • Search Most Read Story Most Viewed Photo
     Print
     Mail
     wiki links

    Protectionism heard at congress

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: While the country has benefited from increased foreign investment, some industry sectors are saying it's time to stem the flow

    REUTERS, BEIJING
    Monday, Oct 22, 2007, Page 11

    Chinese leaders during the closing session of the 17th Chinese Communist Party Congress at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing yesterday. The party ended the congress after amending its charter to include Chinese President Hu Jintao's economic model for the nation and endorsing leadership changes.
    PHOTO: AFP
    No country has prospered more than China by opening up to trade and investment, so a nationalist hum for protection on the sidelines of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Congress that ended yesterday was all the more striking.

    China's manufacturing juggernaut might seem unstoppable to hard-pressed US and European firms, but some in China see things quite differently: They worry about the inroads foreigners are making into the world's fourth-largest economy.

    They might not be a majority but grumbling from a number of businesses, from airlines to equipment makers, contrasted sharply with Chinse President Hu Jintao's (胡錦濤) vow to keep opening the economy and seek "win-win" cooperation between Chinese and foreign firms.

    "Why is the Chinese dairy industry in the state it's in now?" asked Pan Gang (潘剛), chairman of dairy firm and Olympics sponsor Yili (伊利集團), discussing the reasons behind a price crunch that analysts say leaves some 40 percent of dairy farmers in the red.

    "This is the most critical time -- right now. I think the entire country, the entire party, from top to bottom, needs to unify their idea on this point. Industrial adjustment and upgrading will decide the future of China's economy and development -- even its fate."

    Guo Shuqing, chairman of China Construction Bank

    "Because many of the foreign firms are only looking for short-term gain when they come here," Pan said. "When the foreign companies come in, they just take away the milk."

    To be sure, the overwhelming majority of policy makers argued that China cannot backtrack on market reforms.

    "Opening up brings new problems and new risks, but we cannot control the risks -- it is not possible to control them -- by shutting the door again," Hu Xiaolian (胡曉煉), head of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, said during one session.

    Still, interviews with a range of corporate chiefs who are also CCP members highlighted not just their rapidly growing influence -- entrepreneurs were officially welcomed into the party only five years ago, though many had joined before -- but how emboldened they are to lobby for their own interests.

    Li Jiaxiang (李家祥), chairman of Air China, said Beijing needed to keep a check on the opening of the sector so that it can cultivate one or two globally competitive "super-carriers."

    "If foreign investors get control of the big domestic airlines, it will be very difficult to restructure the industry in the future," Li said in an interview.

    Yang Yuanyuan (楊元元), head of the civil aviation regulator, struck back, saying he had been successfully balancing the best interests of consumers, airlines and the country as a whole.

    "If our airlines want to become strong, they can only do so against the backdrop of international competition," Yang said. "If they rely on protection, they can't become strong."

    The stakes of such arguments are very real for Western companies and governments -- and for the global economy.

    The more the nationalist argument wins out, the more tense Beijing's trade relations with the US and EU will become, potentially sparking spiralling protectionism.

    What has been clear for months is that, faced with a flood of cash from its bulging trade surplus and inflows of foreign direct investment, China is becoming increasingly picky about how it uses foreign direct investment.

    Jiang Kaiwen (姜開文), chairman of Laiwu Steel Group (萊蕪鋼鐵集團), said his firm had sought a foreign partner but was blocked.

    "The government is tightening foreign investment in polluting industries; it needs to be environmentally friendly, and so forth," Jiang said.

    Comments by Guo Shuqing (郭樹清), chairman of China Construction Bank, highlighted the tension that the open-versus-closed debate is generating among businessmen and policy makers.

    Guo is tipped by insiders as a candidate to lead the central bank should its current governor, Zhou Xiaochuan (周小川), lose his job.

    In one session, Guo spoke with great passion of the need to press on with industrial restructuring, despite worries about job cuts.

    "This is the most critical time -- right now. I think the entire country, the entire party, from top to bottom, needs to unify their idea on this point," Guo said.

    "Industrial adjustment and upgrading will decide the future of China's economy and development -- even its fate," he said.
    This story has been viewed 1179 times.

  • Advertising