The US Supreme Court has shaken up the standard for patents in rulings that could have far-reaching implications for the technology sector, but also other industries such as pharmaceuticals.
Two rulings in the last week set new standards for challenges to patents, in the face of some calls to curb litigation from so-called "patent trolls" or firms whose sole existence is based on extracting royalty payments.
Legal analysts say the court's decisions may limit "junk patent" lawsuits that have affected the high-tech industry, but may also have some unintended effects of hurting patent protection for other sectors such as pharmaceuticals.
In one key ruling, the nine US justices tossed out a patent for an adjustable accelerator pedal for motorists as "obvious."
The case involved a suit by auto parts makers KSR International against Teleflex, which developed a system that combines sensor technology with a mechanism to automatically set the height of vehicle control pedals for drivers of different sizes.
By ruling the patent as "obvious" the justices held that a company cannot hold a valid patent for a device that anyone could have invented, such as a wheel or door.
"Granting patent protection to advances that would occur in the ordinary course without real innovation retards progress and may ... deprive prior inventions of their value," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote.
"In the short-term, this case reduces the average value of patent holdings," Boston University law professor Dennis Crouch said.
"Courts should find it easier to invalidate patents based on expert testimony and the jury's concept of obviousness. The story also becomes more important -- and attorneys who can tell an `invention story' will be in demand," he said.
In a separate case the same day, the high court ruled that AT&T could not collect damages from Microsoft for patented software sold in other countries.
The two decisions taken with an opinion earlier this year shifts power away from patent holders, analysts said. Some in the technology sector say the court has given a boost to innovation by limiting frivolous litigation.
"We are encouraged by the court's efforts to clamp down on obvious patents," said Ed Black at the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA).
"It reaffirms what we have always said: `The patent system's purpose is to promote innovation, not patents,'" he said.
CCIA had been outspoken last year when Research in Motion (RIM), maker of the Blackberry, was sued by NTP Inc, a US firm that had accused RIM of violating its patents in its mobile software. RIM eventually settled the case.
Another case that drew wide attention was a suit against online auction firm eBay from a company that patented the use of a computer mouse to click and make an online purchase.
The decision could also benefit Internet telephony firm Vonage Holdings, which risks being shut down in a patent dispute with Verizon Communications.
"Vonage is trying to invalidate Verizon's patents," said John Fuisz, a Washington-based patent lawyer. "I'm sure the KSR decision will help them."
Some analysts said the court may be turning the tide too far and in the process discouraging innovation. The pharmaceutical industry has argued against any weakening of the current patent system.
"Given the time and expense necessary to develop new drugs, intellectual property rights, especially those involving patent rights, are critical to [pharmaceutical firms] and their research and development efforts," said a brief filed in the case by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.
Allen Baum, president of the Licensing Executives Society, a group focused on intellectual property, said the court "may end up watering down the patent system to the point where it no longer serves the function intended to appropriately award innovation."
"Right now we have Congress, the Supreme Court and the Patent Office all making changes to patent law in response to intense pressure from those who believe that patents have become too strong," he said, noting that the latest cases fail to distinguish between scientific categories of inventions.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source