If the Japanese want to sell cars here, they must build them here, US automakers insisted back in the fuel-shocked 1970s.
And build them they did. Detroit's brake, it turns out, was Japan's accelerator.
Last week, for the first time, Japanese auto companies said they were now selling more vehicles outside Japan than at home -- the bulk in the US. What's more, Japan's biggest automaker, Toyota, upset Ford for second place in the US market last month and reported a huge rise in profits for the quarter.
It's possible that none of this would have happened, Japanese car company officials say, had US executives, politicians and union officials not put pressure on their companies nearly 30 years ago to build factories in the US. It certainly wouldn't have happened so fast.
"You could never do that by simply shipping cars from Japan," said Dennis Cuneo, a senior vice president at Toyota Motor Manufacturing North America.
Stereotype
Beyond expanding US sales, the plants have given the Japanese companies a window into US life, creating thousands of jobs in grateful communities and blunting the stereotype of the automakers as predators interested only in sending profits back to Japan.
Detroit's strategy seemed like a good idea at the time. When they began demanding that the Japanese companies build factories in the US, the four US companies -- GM, Ford, Chrysler and American Motors -- had almost 70 percent of the domestic market. They employed nearly 800,000 people in factories that carpeted the country.
But two fuel shocks in the 1970s had given Japanese automakers nearly 30 percent of the market, up from less than 20 at the start of the decade, and Detroit was glancing more frequently in the rearview mirror.
Henry Ford II at Ford and Lee Iacocca at Chrysler led the calls for the Japanese companies to open factories or face limits on sales. Douglas Fraser, the president of the United Automobile Workers at the time, went further. Fraser, whose union was pushing measures in Congress that would have limited each Japanese company to just 200,000 sales a year, flew to Japan to confront the leaders of Toyota, Honda, Nissan and Mitsubishi.
"Invest where your market is," Fraser told them, he recalled last week. "Build cars where your consumers are."
"I not only advocated it, I yelled at them," he said with a chuckle.
Ultimately, Japan and the US agreed to voluntary limits on the imports, essentially forcing the companies to build in the US. Detroit reasoned that the limits would give it time to recoup lost ground, as the Japanese sorted through the complexities of setting up plants and pipelines of parts to supply them.
Not only did the ground remain lost, so did the unquestioning loyalty of US consumers, as Japanese companies moved in on virtually every market, from family cars to luxury models to minivans.
Despite having three decades to outwit the Japanese, GM, Ford and Chrysler find themselves in a worse situation. The big SUVs and pickups that fed profits in the 1990s and helped them briefly halt the Japanese climb are falling out of favor in the face of US$1.26-a-liter gasoline, and Detroit has failed to develop enough fuel-efficient cars to overcome its gas-guzzling image.
The US companies are stuck with heavy labor costs, especially for pensions and health care, which they say make them unable to compete with the Japanese, largely unburdened by union contracts and hefty legacy costs.
Detroit held 52 percent of the market last month, its smallest share ever. The Japanese took nearly 40 percent of the US market, their biggest.
Only now, most of the Japanese sales come from the factories that Detroit insisted they create.
Other cultures
And they are not just places to make cars. US plants have given the Japanese companies a tutorial in dealing with other cultures. Toyota is now building its Camry sedan, the US' best-selling car, in seven countries, including Vietnam and China, using ideas gleaned from Camry's base in Kentucky.
Rural towns like Georgetown, Kentucky, and East Liberty, Ohio, mere dots on the map before Toyota and Honda arrived, now boast jobs with US$25-an-hour wages that rival those at Detroit factories, helping offset some of the half-million automotive jobs Detroit lost. The factories have lifted the economies of entire states, like Indiana, which recently won a new Honda plant; Tennessee, where Nissan has two factories and will put its US headquarters; and Alabama, with four major car factories in 15 years.
With that has come influence in state capitals as well as in Washington, where the Japanese no longer face the protectionist threats that forced them to invest in the US. Now states line up to offer millions of dollars in incentives to land their plants, while US President George W. Bush, who said Detroit needed to build "relevant" products, has postponed a meeting with Detroit auto leaders three times this year.
"In an odd way," Cuneo said, "we owe Iacocca a favor for continuing to keep the pressure on."
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft