For more than two years, Kenneth Lay portrayed his prosecution as a witch hunt that rose from the rubble of Enron Corp. It was no secret that he planned to testify in his own defense.
And a lawyer for Jeffrey Skilling, Lay's co-defendant in the historic, four-month fraud and conspiracy trial, told jurors of his client: "You could not keep him off that witness stand."
For both men, it was an enormous gamble, and last week they both paid dearly for it. The former Enron chief executives were convicted of a total of 29 criminal counts, and are likely to spend many years -- perhaps the rest of their lives -- in prison.
PHOTO: AP
"I wanted very badly to believe what they were saying," juror Wendy Vaughan said after the verdicts were announced. "There were places in the testimony I felt their character was questionable."
The sheer number of charges, along with the fact that appeals courts are less likely to overturn jury verdicts -- and both sides praised the judge's handling of the case -- augur poorly for the men's chances of avoiding significant prison time if they appeal.
For white-collar criminal defendants -- and their expensive lawyers -- deciding whether to take the stand is never an easy decision, and legal experts conceded the Lay-Skilling trial was no different.
After all, the federal Enron Task Force had wrung guilty pleas from 16 former Enron executives, and lined up eight of them to testify against their former bosses. Leaving those charges simply unanswered might have been an equal gamble.
But legal experts, while stressing that Monday morning quarterbacking is all too easy, said the decision to testify was probably a mistake -- particularly for Lay, who quickly grew angry and combative when cross-examined by a federal prosecutor.
Not only did the Enron founder have less to defend himself against -- he faced six charges to Skilling's 28 -- Lay had more to lose in terms of his image before he got on the stand. And, what happens there can be so unpredictable, experts said.
"He has an image of being a warm, well-spoken ambassador for the company. And when he did take the stand, he came across in a very different way, in a way that the jurors apparently found arrogant," said Greg Markel, chair of litigation at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP.
Skilling and Lay are to be sentenced on Sept. 11, and both are likely to get double-digit prison terms. Outside court, Skilling's lawyer and Lay himself both insisted the men were innocent.
Analysts said staying off the witness stand may have been less of an option for Skilling, who was forced to defend himself against 10 insider-trading counts related to his sale of Enron shares.
Jurors acquitted him on nine of those counts but convicted him of one -- a US$15.5 million sale six days after Sept. 11, 2001. Skilling initially told investigators he sold because of market fears after the terror attacks, but he had tried on Sept. 6 to sell 200,000 shares. On the stand, Skilling said he simply forgot that attempt.
Skilling was also convicted of 18 counts of fraud, conspiracy and lying to auditors. Some jurors said they could not reconcile Skilling's testimony with his reputation as a hands-on manager.
"It's hard to believe someone, such a hands-on individual, could not possibly know some of the things going on in the company," jury forewoman Deborah Smith said.
Legal experts also said they were surprised Lay and Skilling said on the witness stand -- indeed, based their entire defenses on the idea -- that there was no overarching fraud at Enron.
David Berg, a Houston civil litigator who has published a book about juries, called it "the Peter Pan defense -- clap real hard and Enron will reappear, and nothing wrong happened. Well, plenty wrong happened."
He said it may have hurt Lay that, having been denied a request to have his case heard separately from Skilling, Lay chose to pursue a unified defense with Skilling.
In that case, it may have helped if Lay had at least stayed off the stand, Berg said.
"If Lay had not testified, I think it would have allowed the jury to focus their attention on Skilling and to conclude that Lay was a victim of Skilling rather than a cohort," Berg said.
The four-and-a-half years since Enron's collapse touched off an era of corporate scandal are littered with examples of executives who took the witness stand and paid the price for it.
Former WorldCom Inc CEO Bernard Ebbers and former Tyco International Ltd CEO Dennis Kozlowski were convicted after taking the stand and insisting they did nothing wrong.
Richard Scrushy, former chief executive of HealthSouth Corp, was acquitted last year of fraud charges after five of his former chief financial officers took the stand and implicated him. He did not testify.
"I didn't take the stand because I knew they had not put on evidence proving I did anything wrong," Scrushy told Fox News Channel after Lay and Skilling were found guilty. "When they testified I thought maybe there was something there they were worried about."
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft