We might imagine a movie called Number 5 to be a low-budget work by an austere auteur who regards narrative titles as suspiciously commercial: the movies numbered 1 to 4 were probably 8mm experimental pieces he made in film school.
But Number 5 is, at an estimated US$11 million per minute, the biggest-budget movie ever made and could hardly be more commercial. In fact, it is a commercial: costing a reported US$33 million, the film -- reuniting director Baz Luhrmann with his Moulin Rouge star Nicole Kidman -- is an ad for the Chanel fragrance.
In a week when the marketing of art reached new levels of intensity -- with the stage show The Producers and the film Bridget Jones: The Edge of Reason huckstered like firewood in an ice age -- Luhrmann and Kidman's Number 5 represents the most concerted attempt in cultural history to pass off marketing as art.
Advertising has traditionally been regarded as a school for the cinematic academy: Alan Parker, Ridley and Tony Scott and Jonathan Glazer all moved from corporate shorts to the feature drama form, and critics still routinely rebuke them for betraying their salesman's roots in the tendency to make all weather resemble a sunset.
While respected directors have moved from Hollywood to product-selling before (Ang Lee and John Frankenheimer made Internet ads for BMW some years ago), Luhrmann is the most notable example of someone going against the usual traffic.
All the body-language of the Chanel campaign stresses that selling a smell can be as artistically significant as shooting a movie. When the ad is shown in cinemas (before the new Bridget Jones film) and in its full-length version on TV, the two minutes of action is followed by a full minute of credits. Journalists attending previews were handed a press release more lavishly produced than many books. The director has said that he wants Number 5 to be figured as a film rather than a commercial.
So does Baz's Chanel sell have the authentic whiff of film? The obvious objection to two minutes of celluloid is that it must lack the narrative momentum and development that is implied by the very word "movie."
In fact, there is rather more incident within the 120 seconds of storytelling in Number 5 than in many European movies screened in competition at Cannes and Venice. Kidman plays the most beautiful but also the loneliest actress in the world (you sense Luhrmann was pushing at an open door when he pitched that to her) who, fleeing the paparazzi in Manhattan, jumps into a taxi occupied by a young bohemian. Boy and girl fall in love in a series of spectacular tableaux that suggest that Luhrmann is still besotted with his storyboards for Moulin Rouge.
But, even if the work tells enough of a tale to qualify as a film, the purist objection would be that it can't be a movie because it is designed to make the viewer buy something. Yet this disqualification is problematic: the level of product placement in Hollywood movies is now so extreme that a major moment in the Julia Roberts movie Runaway Bride is the best ad Federal Express ever had, while The Manchurian Candidate and Cellphone both contain Nokia plot-twists.
In fact, paradoxically, Luhrmann's Number 5 is -- until the moment when the arty bloke susses why the actress smells the way she does -- startlingly free of brand names by modern movie standards.
Much of the value of this is novelty: Luhrmann and Kidman would be unwise to make Number 5: 2. Inevitably, other exclusive brands are now said to be craving their own mini-movie, raising the dangerous possibility of a Quentin Tarantino short for some expensive product: The Bill Will Kill. What Luhrmann and Kidman have done for Chanel certainly doesn't stink, but a culture in which this much money and talent can be spent on an advert invites some nose-wrinkling.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source