The booming 1990s have been gone long enough to begin identifying the lasting improvements that those prosperous years made in our lives -- and the promises that faded.
Personal computers and the Internet spread everywhere, enhancing communication in endless, permanent ways. Corporate productivity rose significantly for the first time since the early 1970s, and some of that enriching gain seems likely to endure in the post-boom years. Wages are another matter; the promise evaporated.
The hope was that income inequality would finally lessen, or at least stop growing. And it did stop for a while. But the brief respite demonstrated how deeply embedded income inequality has become in the last 20 years, suspending its destructive inroads only in an overheated economy.
``What you would expect from the strongest economy in a generation was to see income inequality diminish,'' said Jared Bernstein, a labor economist at the Economic Policy Institute. ``Instead we just held our ground.''
Americans often think of income inequality as pertaining to the really rich -- executives and highfliers in the 99th percentile of the income scale -- pulling rapidly away from the rest of the population. But the income inequality embedded in our system is a more down-home phenomenon.
Rather than millionaires, the men and women at the upper end who figure in many studies of income inequality are those in the 90th percentile, earning US$1,440 a week, on average, today. Their wages, adjusted for inflation, have risen steadily since the early 1980s while the wages of those in the middle (US$646 a week) and at the low end (US$307) have stagnated or lost ground to inflation. The break in this pattern occurred in 1996 and lasted through most of 1999, when the wages of all three groups rose smartly and at the same rate. Then suddenly, in the final months of 1999, the weekly wages of those at the upper end pulled away again.
That is the surprising new finding of Bernstein and his organization. While the Economic Policy Institute is known for its liberal views, its detailed analyses of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics are accepted as accurate by most economists and policy makers. In his latest study, Bernstein focused on the bedrock labor force: full-time workers at least 25 years old. He counted only their wages, overtime, commissions and tips, not bonuses, profit sharing or stock options: the earnings of ordinary folk, in other words.
While the wage spread between the high end and the middle was US$707 a week in the fall of 1999, it had widened to US$790 in this year's first quarter, adjusted for inflation. The US$83-a-week difference may be a car loan payment or the extra cost of healthier food. That gave the upper end another leg up in living standards, which is what makes income inequality so divisive.
When the wages of all three groups were rising in tandem in the boom years, Bernstein argued that a tight labor market and the strong demand for workers had halted the growth in income inequality. What the nation needed, he said, were policies that kept the unemployment rate at around 4 percent. But the unemployment rate was still falling toward 4 percent in late 1999 when the wages at the upper end separated from the pack and took off.
Hours may have played a role. About that time, overtime hours began to fall, an early warning that the boom was starting to fade. Manufacturing workers in particular collected smaller weekly paychecks. They are mostly men. Income inequality, in fact, is mainly brought on by men; women's wages at the high end, middle and low end have risen in tandem through the 1980s and 1990s.
Some labor economists contend that the rise in income inequality is largely a result of the demand for skilled, college-educated workers in an ever more high-technology workplace. These skilled workers are indeed the people in Bernstein's high-end group. But David Card, a labor economist at the University of California at Berkeley, notes that the demand for high-technology workers was never greater than in the late 1990s, and yet wages rose across the board.
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
BULLY TACTICS: Beijing has continued its incursions into Taiwan’s airspace even as Xi Jinping talked about Taiwan being part of the Chinese family and nation China should stop its coercion of Taiwan and respect mainstream public opinion in Taiwan about sovereignty if its expression of goodwill is genuine, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said yesterday. Ministry spokesman Jeff Liu (劉永健) made the comment in response to media queries about a meeting between former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) the previous day. Ma voiced support for the so-called “1992 consensus,” while Xi said that although the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have “different systems,” this does not change the fact that they are “part of the same country,” and that “external
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source