Hyundai Motor Co is dropping US$100 million on an ad campaign tied to the World Cup to be jointly hosted by Japan and South Korea. Across the Sea of Japan, Toshiba Corp is raffling tickets and Fuji Xerox Co plans to put a lot of gadgets into the hands of those organizing this year's football -- as in soccer to you Americans -- championship matches.
Business will do business in connection with this event, the opening match of which is scheduled for May 31 in Seoul. And let's not forget the construction companies -- prominent in both the Japanese and South Korean economies. Between them, Seoul and Tokyo will spend US$8 billion on these games, much of that going into new stadiums and infrastructure. The "construction state" lives on in all its boondoggling glory, it seems.
The diplomatic payoff is not so promising, however. As the first World Cup to be co-hosted across national frontiers, these games were supposed to bring two nations with long-time animosities closer together. But it isn't working out that way.
PHOTO: REUTERS
The squabbles have been many, and the fact that almost all of them have been petty only underscores the reality: The games will do nothing for bilateral ties other than show the fault lines.
The question to be asked isn't terribly complicated: So what? Anyone who takes the infighting between South Koreans and Japanese over the World Cup as a measure of diplomatic progress or the absence thereof is simply -- you'll have to forgive me for this one -- not keeping his eye on the ball.
Sports and money -- I've never viewed this as a pleasing mixture; rarely, if ever, does it work to the benefit of the former. It is the same with sports and diplomacy. From the famous Sino-American ping-pong matches onward, I've never seen a case where the benefits of such events come anywhere near the expectations in diplomatic terms. Sports is sports, as Yogi Berra never said but should have.
By the same token, bilateral ties is bilateral ties, and I don't see that they are going so badly for the South Koreans and the Japanese. Yes, Tokyo stands with Washington on the North Korean question -- which puts the Japanese at odds with President Kim Dae-Jung's "sunshine policy" toward Pyongyang. Yes, there have been more upsets over Japanese history texts, the most recent of which erupted a year ago, when a group of conservative Japanese historians published a volume with all the familiar omissions.
But consider how these matters are now handled.
Prime Minister Junchiro Koizumi, who proved his nationalist credentials last August by ritually honoring Japan's war dead, has been critical of Washington's axis-of-evil take on global affairs.
Koizumi has just visited Seoul for the second time in six months.
On his last tour -- a seven-hour whirlwind -- he extended yet another apology for Japan's wartime aggression and agreed to launch a bilateral commission of scholars that will vet schoolbooks and expose any distortions.
More to the point, the main event of Koizumi's visit to Seoul last week was the announcement of talks to forge a bilateral free-trade agreement between the two countries. Tokyo just recently signed an FTA with Singapore and is currently negotiating one with Mexico.
An FTA with Korea will not come overnight, certainly. But I'm hard-pressed to see that things between Seoul and Tokyo are on anything other than an upward swing.
In the credit-where-credit-is-due department, this trend toward rapprochement began during a four-day trip to Japan by President Kim four years ago. I happened to be in Tokyo at the time, and Kim's performance was startling. The past is important and we must nod to it, Kim told Keizo Obuchi, the late prime minister. Let us repair the damage -- but only as we look to the future.
The driving force then was economics. Kim recognized, perhaps before any other Asian leader, that regional interdependence was the true name of the game to be played in coming years.
The lesson here is simple: Economic circumstances define diplomacy -- you can always count on this -- far more effectively than football matches.
The interesting thing to note now is -- please, once more and never again -- who's in possession of the ball.
As the World Cup opens, South Korea looks every bit the shining star, while Japan plods along behind like an out-of-breath also-ran. South Korea's growth this year is forecast to reach 4 percent and its non-performing loan problem is disappearing. And Japan? Just the opposite: declining growth, rising NPLs.
Animosity is perhaps understandable under the circumstances.
So long as it's played out on a football pitch, I'm not particularly concerned.
Patrick Smith is a former correspondent in Asia and the author of Japan: A Reinterpretation. The opinions expressed are his own.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source