Occasionally you might wonder where your next few million may be coming from. How is the yacht going to get paid for? What about the alimony? How will you ever afford a house in the Boltons, the Hamptons, or any other kind of 'tons? Relax. Put on a Dido CD, swing your feet up on the desk, and read on: This column is about to explain how you can make free money for the rest of your life with no effort whatsoever.
It's called the private equity business. Right now, it looks like the best thing going.
Two recent court actions have shone some light on this often neglected corner of the financial universe. In one, a New York-based hedge fund called Millennium Partners LP is suing a venture capital fund called meVC Inc. In another, Forstmann Little & Co, the buyout fund run by Wall Street veteran Theodore Forstmann, is being sued by the Connecticut state pension plan.
Both illustrate why private equity is such a lucrative industry, in ways that its champions would rather not talk about.
They help to explain why for many of the smartest people in the financial markets, it has been the hottest ticket around for the last few years.
A battle between a hedge fund and a private equity fund looks like the kind of spat in which it would be foolish to take sides. Like piranhas complaining that sharks are giving flesh-eating fish a bad name, there is probably right and wrong on both sides. All the same, the statement put out by Millennium is an education in the sharper side of corporate finance.
The story goes like this. MeVC runs a fund called the meVC Draper Fisher Jurvetson Fund 1, in which Millennium has been one of the major investors. So far so good. The trouble started when Millennium looked at what was happening to its money and didn't like what it saw. In its lawsuit, Millennium alleges "excessive, unreasonable and unearned fees have been received by meVC Advisers." Excessive, unreasonable and unearned? It is hard to say which of those adjectives sound sweeter to anyone interested in making lots of money for doing nothing. How do we get our fingers into that honey pot exactly? Like this, according to the writ. The stated objective of the fund was to make venture capital investments in information technology companies. But, through the 2001 fiscal year, over 60 percent of the money remained in cash. In spite of that, meVC carried on collecting fees on all the money sitting in the fund.
Not just that. Millennium goes on to allege that even though Securities & Exchange Commission approvals to make follow-on investments in other Draper Fisher funds weren't forthcoming, meVC made no downward adjustment in its 2.5 percent advisory fee or its 20 percent incentive fee.
Nor, it further alleges, did it make sufficient mark-downs in the net asset value of the fund, even as the value of those investments it did make tumbled in value (by January this year, those investments had lost 54 percent of their value). The result of not marking down the net asset values was "inflated advisory fees." "The advisers took in excess of US$12 million in fees," said Robert Knapp, the managing director of Millennium in a statement accompanying the action, "essentially making shareholders pay them to `manage' money sitting in money-market assets." Now, no one would question that opening a bank account can be a tricky business. There are forms to be filled in, boxes to be ticked, and statements to be checked. Nor would anyone question that meVC did an excellent job of opening the account.
They probably got one that paid an excellent rate of interest, offered a free credit card and maybe even some air miles. Still, US$12 million seems like a lot even for that arduous task.
Over in Connecticut they are little happier with their adventure into the private equity business. In late February, the Connecticut state pension plan said it was suing Forstmann Little & Co to recover more than $100 million in what it claimed were unauthorized investments in two money-losing telecommunications companies.
The nub of its complaint is that the fund they invested in shouldn't have taken stakes in those companies, and that write-offs involved in the investments gave an advantage to partners in later funds. "They double-crossed us, pretending to be our partners and selling us out," said the state's Attorney General Richard Blumenthal. Forstmann is fighting the action.
In both of these cases there is no doubt right and wrong on both sides. MeVC and Forstmann may well be completely blameless, and their opponents just sore losers who start calling their lawyers every time they lose money on an investment. The judges will decide in due course.
The outcome of those cases does not matter much to anyone except the litigants. What does matter is the glimpse it gives us into the way the private equity business works.
Tens of billions have been invested in buy-out funds in both the US and Europe. But those funds remain private, disclose very little information, and remain largely free of scrutiny.
Their doors are usually closed. What happens behind them, few people ever find out.
While again stressing that meVC and Forstmann are most likely as innocent as new-born lambs, there is obviously scope for abuse. Fees can be levied for money sitting in cash accounts.
Net asset values can be manipulated to keep fees buoyant.
Investments can be shunted between funds managed by the same house (or between houses -- it's odd how regularly businesses are sold from one buy-out fund to another), either to salvage poor investments or to make sure performance targets are met. Private equity firms probably don't need more regulation -- few industries ever do -- but they certainly need more disclosure.
Still, it is good to know that even in these straightened, post-bubble times it is still possible for clever young financiers to make lots of money for not doing very much. That, after all, is what the capital markets are mostly about.
RETHINK? The defense ministry and Navy Command Headquarters could take over the indigenous submarine project and change its production timeline, a source said Admiral Huang Shu-kuang’s (黃曙光) resignation as head of the Indigenous Submarine Program and as a member of the National Security Council could affect the production of submarines, a source said yesterday. Huang in a statement last night said he had decided to resign due to national security concerns while expressing the hope that it would put a stop to political wrangling that only undermines the advancement of the nation’s defense capabilities. Taiwan People’s Party Legislator Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) yesterday said that the admiral, her older brother, felt it was time for him to step down and that he had completed what he
Taiwan has experienced its most significant improvement in the QS World University Rankings by Subject, data provided on Sunday by international higher education analyst Quacquarelli Symonds (QS) showed. Compared with last year’s edition of the rankings, which measure academic excellence and influence, Taiwanese universities made great improvements in the H Index metric, which evaluates research productivity and its impact, with a notable 30 percent increase overall, QS said. Taiwanese universities also made notable progress in the Citations per Paper metric, which measures the impact of research, achieving a 13 percent increase. Taiwanese universities gained 10 percent in Academic Reputation, but declined 18 percent
UNDER DISCUSSION: The combatant command would integrate fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups to defend waters closest to the coastline, a source said The military could establish a new combatant command as early as 2026, which would be tasked with defending Taiwan’s territorial waters 24 nautical miles (44.4km) from the nation’s coastline, a source familiar with the matter said yesterday. The new command, which would fall under the Naval Command Headquarters, would be led by a vice admiral and integrate existing fast attack boat and anti-ship missile groups, along with the Naval Maritime Surveillance and Reconnaissance Command, said the source, who asked to remain anonymous. It could be launched by 2026, but details are being discussed and no final timetable has been announced, the source
CHINA REACTS: The patrol and reconnaissance plane ‘transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,’ the 7th Fleet said, while Taipei said it saw nothing unusual The US 7th Fleet yesterday said that a US Navy P-8A Poseidon flew through the Taiwan Strait, a day after US and Chinese defense heads held their first talks since November 2022 in an effort to reduce regional tensions. The patrol and reconnaissance plane “transited the Taiwan Strait in international airspace,” the 7th Fleet said in a news release. “By operating within the Taiwan Strait in accordance with international law, the United States upholds the navigational rights and freedoms of all nations.” In a separate statement, the Ministry of National Defense said that it monitored nearby waters and airspace as the aircraft